New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Fracking to Free Natural Gas?

A new technique to shatter shale and get the gas within offers promise--and peril. David Biello reports

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

That's the sound of

fracking—pumping a mix of water, sand and chemicals a mile or more into the Earth to shatter shale deposits and release the natural gas within.  

From the Barnett shale in Texas to the "supergiant" Marcellus shale that stretches from West Virginia to New York State, so much


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


natural gas has been found that the U.S. may have enough to burn for 100 years or more. And burning natural gas releases 43 percent less CO2 than burning coal.  

Fort Worth has transitioned from cow town to gas town. It's the booming capital of fracking with thousands of wells within city limits. But fracking comes with a cost.  

In addition to water use, there's the problem of

what to do with the brine and chemicals left over afterwards. Bad drilling lets natural gas seep up to drinking water aquifers and wells, causing some taps to literally burn . And independent testing has shown toxic gas levels hundreds of times higher than safe limits in nearby DISH, Tex.  

Fracking may have a lot of upside , but such fossil-fuel exploration and exploitation has to be done right. Or we'll have a fracking mess on our hands.

—David Biello

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe