Risky Ripples Allow Eavesdropping On Frisky Frog

The song of the túngara frog creates ripples in the surrounding water, which attracts unwanted attention from predatory bats and rival males. Sophie Bushwick reports


 

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Music is a tough way to make a living. Just ask the túngara frog. Its song can get it killed. Because the motion of its vocal sac when it produces its call also creates ripples in the surrounding water that predators can see.
 
To see how rivals—and predators—respond, researchers built decoys that produced mating calls, ripples or both.
 
When rival males heard the song and saw ripples, they doubled their competitive cries. But if the ripples came from less than 8 centimeters away, the rivals grew quiet, perhaps preparing to fight or flee.
Meanwhile, predatory bats preferred to attack when the model produced both audio and visual cues. But bats also reacted to ripples alone.

Now, túngara frogs shut up fast when a bat’s overhead. But the water’s continuing rippling can give the frogs away. The work is in the journal Science. [W. Halfwerk et al., Risky Ripples Allow Bats and Frogs to Eavesdrop on a Multisensory Sexual Display]

Seems that some animal communication is multi-sensory, and a signal's side effect can have unintended consequences. Like turning a love note into a death rattle.

—Sophie Bushwick

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]
 

Sophie Bushwick was formerly the technology editor at Scientific American. She makes frequent appearances on radio shows such as Science Friday and television networks, including CBS, MSNBC and National Geographic. She has more than a decade of experience as a science journalist based in New York City and previously worked at outlets such as Popular Science,Discover and Gizmodo. Follow Bushwick on X (formerly Twitter) @sophiebushwick

More by Sophie Bushwick

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe