New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Risky Ripples Allow Eavesdropping On Frisky Frog

The song of the túngara frog creates ripples in the surrounding water, which attracts unwanted attention from predatory bats and rival males. Sophie Bushwick reports


 

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Music is a tough way to make a living. Just ask the túngara frog. Its song can get it killed. Because the motion of its vocal sac when it produces its call also creates ripples in the surrounding water that predators can see.
 
To see how rivals—and predators—respond, researchers built decoys that produced mating calls, ripples or both.
 
When rival males heard the song and saw ripples, they doubled their competitive cries. But if the ripples came from less than 8 centimeters away, the rivals grew quiet, perhaps preparing to fight or flee.
Meanwhile, predatory bats preferred to attack when the model produced both audio and visual cues. But bats also reacted to ripples alone.

Now, túngara frogs shut up fast when a bat’s overhead. But the water’s continuing rippling can give the frogs away. The work is in the journal Science. [W. Halfwerk et al., Risky Ripples Allow Bats and Frogs to Eavesdrop on a Multisensory Sexual Display]

Seems that some animal communication is multi-sensory, and a signal's side effect can have unintended consequences. Like turning a love note into a death rattle.

—Sophie Bushwick

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]
 

Sophie Bushwick was formerly the technology editor at Scientific American. She makes frequent appearances on radio shows such as Science Friday and television networks, including CBS, MSNBC and National Geographic. She has more than a decade of experience as a science journalist based in New York City and previously worked at outlets such as Popular Science,Discover and Gizmodo. Follow Bushwick on X (formerly Twitter) @sophiebushwick

More by Sophie Bushwick

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe