Granular Materials Could Thwart Missiles

The harder a projectile hits a granular substance like sand, the more that material acts like a solid, effectively repelling the intruder. Christopher Intagliata reports

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Ever run along wet sand, and it hardens up almost like concrete under your feet? But pick up that same sand and it drizzles through your fingers? "So that's the essence of why granular materials are interesting...” Yale physicist Abe Clark. “…sometimes they can behave like solids." And other times like fluids. Understanding the transitions between liquid and solid, "that's really nontrivial." 

Grains—of sand or otherwise—are Clark’s specialty. He and his colleagues recently investigated how a bucket of beads responds when another object falls into them. It's analogous to dropping a stone on sand, and then observing how the stone's force transfers to the grains. "The top grain is contacted by the intruder, and then it tells a friend, and it tells a friend and so forth, and it moves along a little chain. So what this looks like is basically little lightning bolts of force shooting off the intruder."

But the faster that impact gets—think meteor or missile strike—the more extensive that chain-like network between the grains becomes, meaning the grains behave more like a solid. Which in some cases made the intruding projectiles bounce right off. The findings are in the journal Physical Review Letters. [Abram H. Clark et al, Nonlinear Force Propagation During Granular Impact]

The work was funded in part by the Defense Threat Reduction Agency, part of the DoD, so of course some of the applications are military. Granular materials might be the perfect thing to thwart a missile attack, for example. And on a smaller scale, "well if I was gonna go build sandbags for the military I'd tell them to use little rubber pellets to fill their sandbags with, instead of sand." Because he says rubber beads would create a stronger, longer-lasting repellent force against bullets. But remember, Abe and his colleagues are physicists. "I've seen a couple crazy blogs or something saying, you know, 'scientists are building bunker busters' sorts of, something like that, so no, we're definitely not doing anything like that." After all, that would be a task for engineers.

—Christopher Intagliata

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe