New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Granular Materials Could Thwart Missiles

The harder a projectile hits a granular substance like sand, the more that material acts like a solid, effectively repelling the intruder. Christopher Intagliata reports

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Ever run along wet sand, and it hardens up almost like concrete under your feet? But pick up that same sand and it drizzles through your fingers? "So that's the essence of why granular materials are interesting...” Yale physicist Abe Clark. “…sometimes they can behave like solids." And other times like fluids. Understanding the transitions between liquid and solid, "that's really nontrivial." 

Grains—of sand or otherwise—are Clark’s specialty. He and his colleagues recently investigated how a bucket of beads responds when another object falls into them. It's analogous to dropping a stone on sand, and then observing how the stone's force transfers to the grains. "The top grain is contacted by the intruder, and then it tells a friend, and it tells a friend and so forth, and it moves along a little chain. So what this looks like is basically little lightning bolts of force shooting off the intruder."

But the faster that impact gets—think meteor or missile strike—the more extensive that chain-like network between the grains becomes, meaning the grains behave more like a solid. Which in some cases made the intruding projectiles bounce right off. The findings are in the journal Physical Review Letters. [Abram H. Clark et al, Nonlinear Force Propagation During Granular Impact]

The work was funded in part by the Defense Threat Reduction Agency, part of the DoD, so of course some of the applications are military. Granular materials might be the perfect thing to thwart a missile attack, for example. And on a smaller scale, "well if I was gonna go build sandbags for the military I'd tell them to use little rubber pellets to fill their sandbags with, instead of sand." Because he says rubber beads would create a stronger, longer-lasting repellent force against bullets. But remember, Abe and his colleagues are physicists. "I've seen a couple crazy blogs or something saying, you know, 'scientists are building bunker busters' sorts of, something like that, so no, we're definitely not doing anything like that." After all, that would be a task for engineers.

—Christopher Intagliata

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe