New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

High-Ranking Baboons Heal Faster

The higher their social status, the less likely male baboons are to fall ill and the faster they recover from both illness and injury. Sophie Bushwick reports

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

As any high school quarterback knows, a lofty social status comes with plenty of perks. Now a study of baboons finds that such status benefits may include better health. The study is in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. [Elizabeth A. Archie, Jeanne Altmann and Susan C. Alberts, "Social status predicts wound healing in wild baboons"]

Researchers reviewed 27 years’ worth of records of illness and injury in male baboons to answer one question: Where’s the healthier place on the social pyramid, top or bottom? Each rank carries its own health hazards. Higher-status baboons mate more often, which expends more energy and requires higher levels of testosterone and hormones that can suppress the immune system. Lower-ranking males, on the other hand, are physically weaker and suffer from social stress.

The records indicated that high-status males got sick less frequently and healed faster from both injury and illness. And alpha males, who had to overcome the highest levels of immunosuppressing hormones, still healed fastest, exceeding even other high-status males.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The finding does raise another question: does top-dog status improve immune function, or is it that fast healers rise to the top of the social heap?

—Sophie Bushwick

[The above text is an exact transcript of this podcast.]

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe