How to Re-Create an Ecosystem

What lives in a given ecosystem depends on history. David Biello reports

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

A pond is a rich ecosystem, full of nutrients and life (and lots and lots of beetles). Each pond often has a unique array of species, from plankton to fish—even if it was created by scientists.  

Biologist Jon Chase and his colleagues at Washington University in Saint Louis had noted that it was nigh impossible to make the ecosystems in 300 gallon plastic pools exactly the same—even if all the starting conditions were identical. So he spent seven years trying to figure out why.  

They seeded 45 such pools in the summer of 2002, and let nature take its course. Neighboring plankton species colonized one tank via the wind but not another. Dragonflies flitted from plastic pond to plastic pond to lay their eggs.  


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


In the end, each nutrient-rich pond was different from every other. That was determined largely by specific events in each ponds' history, such as the order in which species were introduced. Randomness trumped the scientists' effort.  

That means restoring an ecosystem—whether a pond or an entire coastline—is no easy task. One random event, like the recent Gulf oil spill, will be written into the tissue and shell of Gulf sea life and marshes for decades to come. 

—David Biello

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe