Hurricanes Move Away from Equator with Expanding Tropics

Since the 1970s the locations where tropical cyclones (hurricanes and typhoons) reach their maximum intensities have shifted toward both poles at a rate of about 35 miles per decade. David Biello reports

 

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


They’re technically called tropical cyclones. But these powerful storms are better known as hurricanes in the U.S. and typhoons in Asia. The violent weather systems wreak havoc on coastlines and islands in tropical areas, as the name implies. 
 
But it looks like tropical cyclones may be moving into areas not currently considered tropical, when the storms reach maximum strength. That's according to a study in the journal Nature. [James P. Kossin, Kerry A. Emanuel and Gabriel A. Vecchi, The poleward migration of the location of tropical cyclone maximum intensity]
 
Researchers looked at the global record of tropical cyclones since the 1970s. That's when such storms started to be reliably monitored by satellites. Using those data, the researchers pinpointed the place on the globe where each storm reached its maximum intensity.

The record reveals that peak cyclone location has been shifting toward both poles at a rate of about 35 miles per decade, roughly one-half a degree of latitude.
 
Of course, tropical zones themselves are expanding. And the researchers suggest the cyclone shift may be linked to that growth, which is connected to more heat-trapping greenhouse gases in the atmosphere as a result of human activity. All of which means that new regions will be at risk for stronger storms as tropical cyclones spread to higher latitudes.
 
—David Biello
 
[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]
 
[Scientific American is part of Nature Publishing Group.]
 

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe