It's Plain the Rain Ups Chili Peppers' Pain

Chili peppers in wet areas are spicier than their dry counterparts, due to higher capsaicin levels needed to fight seed-attacking fungi. Christopher Intagliata reports

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Spiciness is a chili pepper's best defense against seed-attacking microbes. But not all chilies are hot. Because producing that heat comes at a price. So says a study in the journal Proceedings of the Royal Society B. [David C. Haak et al., "Why are not all chilies hot? A trade-off limits pungency"]

Researchers looked at wild chili populations along a 185-mile stretch of southern Bolivia, as the climate goes from wet to dry. At each site, they taste-tested chilies for heat. Later they analyzed samples for concentrations of capsaicinoids—the spicy stuff. Turns out only a fifth of the chili plants in dry regions packed heat. But in wet areas, all the chilies were picante. Because that's where fungi attack the peppers, and the chilies need chemical weapons to protect their seeds.

But there is a cost for that defense. The spicy chili plants in this study use water far less efficiently—and during periods of drought, they produce only half as many seeds as their mild cousins.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


As for home gardeners hoping to grow spicier chilies? Don't figure on simply watering your garden more. The authors say that to select for spicy genes you’ll have to tend the pepper patch for some 20,000 generations.

—Christopher Intagliata

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]
 

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe