New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

La Niña Conditions Spin Up More Springtime Twisters

Severe weather forecasters could incorporate El Niño and La Niña cycling to make springtime tornado and hail forecasts. Christopher Intagliata reports

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


It's been a light year for tornadoes in the U.S.—just a few dozen so far. By this time in 2011, a notoriously deadly tornado year, there had already been more than 120 twisters. Why the variability? 

For decades, scientists have hypothesized that tornado frequency may be related to the fluctuation of sea surface temperatures in the equatorial Pacific—known as El Niño and La Niña. But the link wasn't clear in the peak springtime tornado season. Because observations of tornadoes and hail tend to be most prevalent where people can see them—meaning the data isn't that comprehensive.

So researchers took a step back, looking instead at the basic ingredients of tornadoes and hail: factors like wind shear, humidity and temperature. During La Niña, they indeed saw a boost in the conditions that breed springtime twisters and hail in the southeastern U.S. In El Niño years, they saw the opposite. The findings appear in the journal Nature Geoscience. [John T. Allen et al, Influence of the El Niño/Southern Oscillation on tornado and hail frequency in the United States]

Study author John Allen, a climatologist at the Earth Institute at Columbia University, says the data might be used to create yearly tornado forecasts, like this one: "So the forecast for this spring is a 60 percent chance of being around about normal, because we've got a relatively weak El Nino pattern, which tends to suppress a little bit. So we'd probably say that it's going to be at or below normal." 

Insurance companies or governments could use that data to gauge risk, he says—but no forecast can guarantee safety. "One tornado will still wreck a house. It will still end somebody's life, or destroy their life. And this is the thing to remember. We're saying there’s a lower chance, but even in a quiet year we’re still seeing about 800 tornadoes in the United States. And you know, if the right conditions match up, a tornado can form anywhere on this planet."

—Christopher Intagliata

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

[Scientific American is part of Nature Publishing Group.]
 

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe