La Niña Conditions Spin Up More Springtime Twisters

Severe weather forecasters could incorporate El Niño and La Niña cycling to make springtime tornado and hail forecasts. Christopher Intagliata reports

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


It's been a light year for tornadoes in the U.S.—just a few dozen so far. By this time in 2011, a notoriously deadly tornado year, there had already been more than 120 twisters. Why the variability? 

For decades, scientists have hypothesized that tornado frequency may be related to the fluctuation of sea surface temperatures in the equatorial Pacific—known as El Niño and La Niña. But the link wasn't clear in the peak springtime tornado season. Because observations of tornadoes and hail tend to be most prevalent where people can see them—meaning the data isn't that comprehensive.

So researchers took a step back, looking instead at the basic ingredients of tornadoes and hail: factors like wind shear, humidity and temperature. During La Niña, they indeed saw a boost in the conditions that breed springtime twisters and hail in the southeastern U.S. In El Niño years, they saw the opposite. The findings appear in the journal Nature Geoscience. [John T. Allen et al, Influence of the El Niño/Southern Oscillation on tornado and hail frequency in the United States]

Study author John Allen, a climatologist at the Earth Institute at Columbia University, says the data might be used to create yearly tornado forecasts, like this one: "So the forecast for this spring is a 60 percent chance of being around about normal, because we've got a relatively weak El Nino pattern, which tends to suppress a little bit. So we'd probably say that it's going to be at or below normal." 

Insurance companies or governments could use that data to gauge risk, he says—but no forecast can guarantee safety. "One tornado will still wreck a house. It will still end somebody's life, or destroy their life. And this is the thing to remember. We're saying there’s a lower chance, but even in a quiet year we’re still seeing about 800 tornadoes in the United States. And you know, if the right conditions match up, a tornado can form anywhere on this planet."

—Christopher Intagliata

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

[Scientific American is part of Nature Publishing Group.]
 

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe