Lower Diet Diversity Threatens Crops and Us

More of the world's population is eating the same stuff, meaning more monocultural crops at risk for disease and less gut microbial diversity, a health problem for humans. Cynthia Graber reports 

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Diets all around the world have become increasingly similar. That’s not good news for either human health or for crop health, according to a study in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. [Colin K. Khoury et al, Increasing homogeneity in global food supplies and the implications for food security

Scientists analyzed diet trends over the past 50 years. Overall, people are eating more, and are getting more of those calories from meat, oil and grains.

But the diversity has gone down. Wheat, rice and corn have gotten even more important. Soybeans and sunflower and palm oil have also become larger players. Meanwhile, crops such as sorgum, rye and cassava have dropped in relative importance.

The authors say the trend towards the Western diet contributes to obesity and heart disease—as well as a diminished diversity in oral and gut microbes, which is harmful to health.

Perhaps equally important, the reliance on a small group of foods puts the crops themselves at risk from diseases or climate change.

Study co-author Andy Jarvis says that a more diverse global food system is critical. Quote, “This is the best way, not only to combat hunger, malnutrition, and over-nutrition, but also to protect global food supplies against the impacts of global climate change.”

—Cynthia Graber

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

 

Cynthia Graber is a print and radio journalist who covers science, technology, agriculture, and any other stories in the U.S. or abroad that catch her fancy. She's won a number of national awards for her radio documentaries, including the AAAS Kavli Science Journalism Award, and is the co-host of the food science podcast Gastropod. She was a Knight Science Journalism fellow at MIT.

More by Cynthia Graber

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe