American Water Knowledge Seems Murky
A survey finds that Americans don’t have a good handle on what common activities use the most water. Cynthia Graber reports
By Cynthia Graber
SUBSCRIBE TO Science Quickly
On supporting science journalism
If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
The drought is big news in California. But California’s not alone—climate change will exacerbate water issues.
So what should we do to save water? Turns out that most of us don’t really know, according to research in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. [Shahzeen Z. Attari, Perceptions of water use]
Shahzeen Attari at Indiana University surveyed more than 1,000 Americans online. Respondents were first asked what they could do to conserve the most water.
The vast majority chose curtailing an activity, such as taking a shorter shower. They didn’t give much weight to efficiency measures that involve changing the devices themselves. Such as retrofitting a toilet—which is in fact the most significant water-saving change the average person can make.
Participants also tended to underestimate the water required for activities such as car washing or washing clothes. For instance, the average guess was that a standard washing machine uses 14 gallons of water—it actually uses about 34.
These results indicate that Americans don’t have a good handle on where they use the most water. Such awareness is critical today in California, but is likely to become important for many other regions in the not-too-distant future.
—Cynthia Graber
[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]
Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism
Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.
When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.
Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber
