Narcotics Trafficking Slashes Central American Forests
Central American forests have been razed for roads and plane strips to traffic narcotics as well as agricultural operations used to launder drug money. Cynthia Graber reports
By Cynthia Graber
SUBSCRIBE TO Science Quickly
On supporting science journalism
If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
The drug trade has devastated communities in Central and South America. Policy makers are now looking at moving away from trying to stop drug production, to trying to curb demand. If it works and narcotic producers lose power, Central America’s forests may benefit along with its people. That’s according to a new policy report in the journal Science. [Kendra McSweeney et al., Drug Policy as Conservation Policy: Narco-Deforestation]
It turns out that the growth of the cocaine business has led in Central America to what’s called narco-deforestation. The practice takes place in ecologically sensitive and even protected areas.
Poverty, weak governments, and illegal logging all affect forest use. But Central America has become an important bridge between the U.S. and South America’s cocaine. Forests have been slashed for roads and plane landings. And when local ranchers or timber sellers become rich with drug money, they expand their operations. Narcotic producers also develop habitat for legal agriculture that’s used to launder drug money. Government agents are bribed to turn away, and conservation groups fear entering these areas.
The study authors say that the ecological and conservation impacts of the drug trade are underappreciated—and that they should inform both conservation and drug policy in the future.
—Cynthia Graber
[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]
Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism
Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.
When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.
Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber
