New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Resurgence of Swaddling Brings Hip Fears

Swaddling infants is safe when done correctly. But done wrong, it raises the risk of osteoarthritis and the need for hip replacement in middle age. Dina Fine Maron reports

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

When it comes to feeling safe and warm, there’s nothing like being tightly bundled up in blankets. And snugly swaddling for babies is on the rise—it can sooth excessive crying and help induce sleep. Nine out of 10 infants in North America are swaddled in the first six months of life, and the demand for swaddling clothes soared by 61 percent in the U.K. between 2010 and 2011.

But there’s a downside to the resurgence of traditional swaddling, where the arms are restrained and the legs are stretched out: fears that it will fuel developmental hip problems in babies, known to be linked to the technique.

Swaddling can force the hips to straighten and shift forward, causing misalignment. Which can boost the risk of osteoarthritis and the need for hip replacement in middle age. That’s according to a report in Archives of Disease in Childhood. [N.M.P. Clarke, Swaddling and hip dysplasia: an orthopaedic perspective]


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


These issues do not mean we need to drop swaddling altogether. It can be safe as long as the swaddling allows a baby’s legs to bend up and out at the hips, allowing the hip joints to develop normally. With that in mind, infants—and their parents—can rest easy.

—Dina Fine Maron

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe