New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Oddball Eclipse Makes Star Brighter

When a white dwarf passes in front of its binary star system companion every 88 days, it acts like a lens to make the larger star appear brighter to us.

 

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Eclipses are supposed to make things go dark: the moon blocks the sun, and day turns to night. Now astronomers have accidentally discovered the opposite: an eclipse that makes a star brighter.
Thank Einstein. And Kepler—the space telescope, not Johannes. Launched in 2009, Kepler watched more than 100,000 stars, looking for tiny dips in a star’s brightness caused by orbiting planets when they pass in front of their sun.

But one star didn't get the memo. Every 88 days, it brightens slightly.

Researchers realized that they were actually seeing a binary star system. One of the pair is big and bright like our sun. The other is a white dwarf—a small, dim star a little larger than Earth, but so dense that a spoonful weighs tons.

Because of its high mass, when the white dwarf passes in front of its mate its gravity bends and amplifies the larger star's light, just as Einstein said. In other words, the white dwarf acts like a lens that makes the bigger star appear brighter during the eclipse. The report is in the journal Science. [Ethan Kruse and Eric Agol, A Self-Lensing Binary Star System]

Black holes that orbit stars should do the same thing. So someday someone might find a black hole by looking for the light.

—written by Ken Croswell, voiced by Steve Mirsky

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]
 

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe