Oddball Eclipse Makes Star Brighter

When a white dwarf passes in front of its binary star system companion every 88 days, it acts like a lens to make the larger star appear brighter to us.

 

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Eclipses are supposed to make things go dark: the moon blocks the sun, and day turns to night. Now astronomers have accidentally discovered the opposite: an eclipse that makes a star brighter.
Thank Einstein. And Kepler—the space telescope, not Johannes. Launched in 2009, Kepler watched more than 100,000 stars, looking for tiny dips in a star’s brightness caused by orbiting planets when they pass in front of their sun.

But one star didn't get the memo. Every 88 days, it brightens slightly.

Researchers realized that they were actually seeing a binary star system. One of the pair is big and bright like our sun. The other is a white dwarf—a small, dim star a little larger than Earth, but so dense that a spoonful weighs tons.

Because of its high mass, when the white dwarf passes in front of its mate its gravity bends and amplifies the larger star's light, just as Einstein said. In other words, the white dwarf acts like a lens that makes the bigger star appear brighter during the eclipse. The report is in the journal Science. [Ethan Kruse and Eric Agol, A Self-Lensing Binary Star System]

Black holes that orbit stars should do the same thing. So someday someone might find a black hole by looking for the light.

—written by Ken Croswell, voiced by Steve Mirsky

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]
 

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe