Jupiter's Great Red Spot Now Just Pretty Good
Jupiter's Great Red Spot, once estimated to be 41,000 kilometers across, is just 16,500 kilometers wide in the latest Hubble Space Telescope observations, and the shrinkage seems to be accelerating. Clara Moskowitz reports
By Clara Moskowitz
SUBSCRIBE TO 60-Second Space
On supporting science journalism
If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
Jupiter’s Great Red Spot is looking a little puny lately. The swirling storm has been rapidly shrinking—it’s now smaller than we’ve ever seen it.
The spot, once estimated to be 25,500 miles across, was just 10,250 miles wide when the Hubble Space Telescope last observed it. It’s also changing shape, looking more like a circle than its usual oval.
Astronomers have been tracking this contraction since at least the 1930s. But lately, the downsizing of the Great Red Spot appears to be speeding up.
The massive vortex has been a staple on the solar system’s largest planet ever since it was first recorded in the mid 1800s. Mysteries abound about the spot, such as what powers it and why is it so red. Now add to that, why is it shrinking?
One idea is that small eddies feeding into the storm are altering its internal dynamics, sapping its power. Despite its diminishing stature, however, Jupiter’s cyclone is still nothing to laugh at. It continues to reign as the largest known storm in the universe. And it could easily swallow up the entire Earth.
—Clara Moskowitz
[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]
Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism
Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.
When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.
Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber
