Lighting May Cut Seed-Rich Bat Guano Production
Bats ate less fruit in lit areas than in dark ones, which may lessen their seed-dispersal activities needed to bring back slashed rainforests. Cynthia Graber reports.
By Cynthia Graber
SUBSCRIBE TO 60-Second Earth
On supporting science journalism
If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
Worldwide, rainforests are slashed for agriculture and logging. When a plot of land is used up, it’s often abandoned. Which should allow the rainforest to regenerate. But along with roads and buildings comes lighting. And the artificial light may hamper forest regrowth. Because fruit-eating bats that ordinarily leave behind a rich trail of seeds may decrease their feeding in lit areas.
That’s according to a study in the Journal of Applied Ecology. [Daniel Lewanzik and Christian C. Voigt, Artificial light puts ecosystem services of frugivorous bats at risk]
Researchers looked at captive bats, able to feed from a dark compartment or one dimly lit. And the bats took twice as much food from the dark space as from the lit one.
The researchers also monitored wild bats that fed on fourteen plants ripe with fruit. Each plant could be kept in darkness or illuminated by a street light. Bats harvested fruit from the dark plants quickly and thoroughly. But their take was delayed and decreased on the lit plants.
The researchers conclude that light could interfere with the activities of seed-dispersing bats and thus stall rainforest regeneration. They recommend that artificial outdoor light in deforested tropical areas be restricted. So that bats will eat and let the seeds fall where they may.
—Cynthia Graber
[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]
Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism
Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.
When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.
Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber
