Speaker Sex Affects Listener Processing of Gendered Words

When the sex of the Spanish word and the talker differed, Spanish-speaking listeners took longer to process and act on the verbal information. Karen Hopkin reports.

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Gato.

Lata.

Fajo.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Mora.

Pelo.

Risa.

Confused?

Uh-huh.

Well, you should be. And not just because we’re suddenly speaking en Español, but because each word has a grammatical gender that we purposely mismatched with the sex of the person who said it. Such verbal incongruity can slow our ability to process language, according to linguists writing in the journal PLoS One. [Michael S. Vitevitch et al., Speaker Sex Influences Processing of Grammatical Gender]

When we listen to the spoken word, we take away more than its meaning. We also learn something about the speaker, like where he or she comes from and whether he or she is a he or a she. But some psychologists think that we strip away all that extraneous information when our brains process what we hear.

To test that assumption, researchers asked 20 native Spanish speakers to listen to a list of Spanish words. Half the terms were masculine—they ended in "o"—the other half feminine, ending in ‘a’. And when the sex of the word and the talker differed, listeners who were asked to identify the word’s gender took longer and made more mistakes.

The opposite effect did not take place. Listeners were able to identify the sex of the speaker con no problemo.

—Karen Hopkin

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe