Submerged Lost City Really Bacterially Built

What looked like human-made structures underwater off Greece turned out to be millions-of-years-old concretions deposited by bacteria.

 

University of Athens via EurekAlert

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Tourists snorkeling off the Greek island of Zakynthos in 2013 thought they had made a fabulous discovery: the remains of a lost city. They saw what appeared to be paving stones and the bases of columns in the blue water. But when the Greek government sent in researchers, they didn’t find any other remnants of human activity, such as pottery. So scientists at the University of Athens and the University of East Anglia in England teamed up to investigate.

Julian Andrews, professor of environmental sciences at East Anglia, at first questioned his Athens colleague, geologist Michael Stamatakis.

“When I first saw the pictures I said to Michael, ‘are you sure they're not real?’ Because they really do look like columns. And he said, ‘No no, definitely there's definitely something going on here more than more than that.’


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


After analyzing the mineral content of the formations, Andrews agreed.

“So what we have here is essentially the byproduct of bacterial reactions. So they happen to look rather like human artifacts: buildings, columns, pavements. But they're actually examples of what we call concretion, this mineral that precipitates in the sediment.”

They published their findings in the journal Marine and Petroleum Geology. [Julian E. Andrews et al., Exhumed hydrocarbon-seep authigenic carbonates from Zakynthos Island (Greece): Concretions not archaeological remains]

The bacteria responsible for the formations thrive near seeps—usually found in much deeper water than in this case—that vent gases such as methane. The microbes break down the methane as fuel. That act sets off a chain of reactions that leads to the creation of dolomite—basically a natural cement. The bacteria got to work on these formations long before Ancient Greece existed—or modern humans, for that matter.

“It looks like they could be as old as three or four million years old. So these would have been buried in the sediment millions of years ago and then have been eroded or exhumed by currents in modern coastal waters.”

Underwater archaeology fans shouldn’t be put off just because these ruins were built by bacteria.  

“I think they're very beautiful things to see anyway, so it's still a great place to go snorkeling. And also when you build structures like this, where you have sort of columns and cavities and crypts and so forth, these are very good places. They’re rather like reefs really…so I think people can enjoy the natural formations. It’s just amazing how you have, how similar they do look to human remains and artifacts.”

—Cynthia Graber

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

Cynthia Graber is a print and radio journalist who covers science, technology, agriculture, and any other stories in the U.S. or abroad that catch her fancy. She's won a number of national awards for her radio documentaries, including the AAAS Kavli Science Journalism Award, and is the co-host of the food science podcast Gastropod. She was a Knight Science Journalism fellow at MIT.

More by Cynthia Graber

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe