Subway DNA Survey Finds Microbes, Mozzarella and Mystery

Scientists sequenced genetic material found in all 468 New York City subway stations, and nearly half matched no known organism. Christopher Intagliata reports

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


A 2014 analysis found that New York City’s Queens was the most ethnically diverse county in the continental U.S. But when it comes to the diversity of DNA found in each borough's subway stops--the Bronx takes the prize.

"I live in Brooklyn so I was kind of hoping Brooklyn might be top of the list but we're second place. Manhattan in the middle. And then Queens, and then Staten Island." Christopher Mason, a geneticist "a very curious geneticist, I'd say" at the Weill Cornell Medical College in Manhattan.

Mason's curiosity led him and his colleagues on a five-borough tour of New York’s 468 subway stations, and the Staten Island Railway. They swabbed turnstiles, kiosks, benches, trash cans, railings and subway cars, then sequenced every bit of DNA they found. The result? "The subway kind of looks like skin." Meaning they found a whole lot of bacteria, like Pseudomonas, that also live on our skin.

The DNA at each subway stop mirrored the genetic diversity of the local residents—and, what they like to eat. "We could see other evidence of things like molecular echoes of pizza. Cucumbers, as well as chickpeas that might be from falafels or hummus." The researchers also found DNA fragments from anthrax and plague bacteria. But don’t panic. "We have zero evidence that they're alive or remotely pose a risk to public health." 

The team turned up some 1,700 organisms in total. But nearly half the DNA they sequenced could not be linked to any known organism. Assuming there’s no actual Men In Black-type extraterrestrial police agency operating underground in Manhattan, the unknown DNA means that we either haven't discovered some subway dwellers—or maybe we just haven't sequenced their DNA yet. The study is in the journal Cell Systems. [Ebrahim Afshinnekoo et al, Geospatial Resolution of Human and Bacterial Diversity with City-Scale Metagenomics]

Despite the mysterious genetic sequences, Mason says the research has made his commute a little more carefree. "And the study has replaced what used to be sort of a fog of almost fear maybe about what might be on the surface to concrete knowledge that the vast majority of everything under our fingerprints is mostly benign, so, I've become much more confident."

—Christopher Intagliata

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]
 

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe