Texts May Beat Phone Calls for Survey Honest Answers

A study of 600 iPhone users found that people are more likely to provide honest and accurate information via text messages than voice interviews. Larry Greenemeier reports

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Someone doing a survey calls and asks: "How many times a week would you say you exercise?" What do you tell them? And would it be different if the survey was being done via text rather than telephone?

Maybe. Because people are more likely to provide honest and accurate information via text messages than voice interviews. So finds a study reported at the annual meeting of the American Association for Public Opinion Research. [Michael F. Schober et al., "Disclosure and Quality of Answers in Text and Voice Interviews on iPhones"]

The researchers thought most people would rather share sensitive or controversial information over the phone, a much more familiar technology. Plus, texting creates a possibly-off-putting permanent, stored record of questions and answers.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The researchers are still trying to interpret the results. One thought is that texting, as opposed to talking, can be done at the participant’s leisure and more privately, which could lead to more truthfulness.

The research team reached out to only 600 iPhone users. So the work needs to be extended. But if it’s verified, it could mean that the best way to poll the public would be to ditch the dinner time phone call in favor of a tea time text.

—Larry Greenemeier

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe