Tool Tells True Tweets from Fakes

An algorithm can evaluate tweets within the overall Twitter flow to assess their veracity. Larry Greenemeier reports

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Twitter has become a go-to news source in times of crisis. However, as we learned once again during the Newtown tragedy, inaccurate or even purposefully deceptive tweets can just as easily spread misinformation.

Conventional wisdom holds that eventually Twitter users themselves will sort fact from rumor. Two problems here. You have to pay attention long enough for this to happen. And you have to hope that falsehoods don’t spread beyond social media, where they are more difficult to correct.

A team of current and former Yahoo researchers is using natural language processing and machine learning to address this problem. When their algorithm is presented with a random false tweet and a random true tweet within the context of the overall flow of information, their software assesses the true tweet as more credible 86 percent of the time. The study is in an upcoming issue of the journal Internet Research. [Carlos Castillo, Marcelo Mendoza and Barbara Poblete, Predicting Information Credibility in Time-Sensitive Social Media]


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Not exactly a social media lie detector yet, but if this research pans out, it could do a lot to help Twitter’s credibility in crunch time.

—Larry Greenemeier

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]
 

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe