Wanted: Gravitational Constant's True Value

Scientists from numerous disciplines will brainstorm new strategies for measuring "Big G" in July.

 

PhotoDisc/Getty Images (MARS)

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

[Audio from movie]

A scene from the movie Gravity. In real life, gravity is always bringing us down—particularly scientists who attempt to measure gravitational force. Try as they might, physicists cannot agree on a precise value of the constant called “Big G,” which denotes the strength of gravity. It’s tough to measure because gravity is incredibly weak compared to other fundamental forces.

“Big G is a fundamental constant of nature, and as such, I think it is important to measure its value precisely.” Stephan Schlamminger of the National Institute of Standards and Technology.  


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The world’s best experiments keep turning up different answers that are incompatible with one another and diverge by about 40 times the uncertainty of the most precise experiment.

The discrepancy is not just embarrassing—knowing the true value of Big G is important in various fields. For example, in efforts to unify general relativity with quantum mechanics in a quantum theory of gravity.

 Aiming to solve the problem, Schlamminger is organizing an “Ideas Lab” gathering under the auspices of the National Science Foundation in July. Scientists from numerous disciplines will brainstorm new strategies for measuring Big G.

“First, I hope for a really good and new idea on how to measure big G. Completely new ideas are rare, and this wish may not get fulfilled. However, when you have a new idea, they can advance the solution to a given problem a lot…short of that, I hope that new collaborations form to tackle this problem…this will infuse new energy in the field, and there are many fascinating questions that need to be answered…and in the ideal best case we get a new, high-precision determination of big G.”

—Clara Moskowitz

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

Clara Moskowitz is chief of reporters at Scientific American, where she covers astronomy, space, physics and mathematics. She has been at Scientific American for more than a decade; previously she worked at Space.com. Moskowitz has reported live from rocket launches, space shuttle liftoffs and landings, suborbital spaceflight training, mountaintop observatories, and more. She has a bachelor’s degree in astronomy and physics from Wesleyan University and a graduate degree in science communication from the University of California, Santa Cruz.

More by Clara Moskowitz

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe