February 12, 2009

Waste Not, Want Not: Energy via the Smart Grid

Simply using instead of losing energy, the U.S.--and the world--could power its way out of crisis. David Biello reports

SUBSCRIBE TO 60-Second Earth

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

[Below is the original script. But a few changes may have been made during the recording of this audio podcast.]

The economic stimulus package will probably end up including more than 15 billion dollars for improvements in energy efficiency like weatherizing homes and some 11 billion dollars to create a so-called smart grid.

But what the heck is a smart grid?

Simplifying drastically, it's bringing the benefits of the internet to our aging system of electrical wires, transformers, and meters

The idea is to reduce the electricity that gets lost in transit—some 7 percent of electricity gets lost that way—and to eliminate unnecessary fossil fuel burning by electric utilities.

But it's also about smarter meters that reveal exactly what is sucking up all that juice. Like our computers or iPods that use energy even when turned off if plugged in.

Google and IBM have already started smart grid projects. The search engine giant has developed an energy tracking program while Big Blue is helping the island nation of Malta develop the world's first intelligent electrical system.

With some 26 billion taxpayer dollars up for grabs in the U.S. and billions more worldwide, that's not just better for the environment, it's smart business. Especially since Google and IBM's server farms are using up so much of that electricity in the first place…

—David Biello 60-Second Earth is a weekly podcast from Scientific American.

On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

Subscribe to this Podcast: RSS | iTunes

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American