Oenophiles Confirm Fruity Flavors Finish First

Wine researchers find that fruity flavors tend to finish quickest on the palate, whereas oaky flavors linger longer--as aficionados have long claimed. Christopher Intagliata reports

 

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The lore among wine aficionados is that fruity flavors tend to finish quickest on the palate, whereas oaky flavors linger longer.

“And then when you go to the scientific literature, you find out that really there haven't been scientific studies done on it.” Carolyn Ross, a sensory scientist at Washington State University.

She and her colleagues investigated the claims. They identified four flavor compounds common in white wine, which give floral, fruity, mushroomy and oaky notes. They then studied the compounds in what’s known as a model wine: “Meaning that it had alcohol in it, it had some sugar, some acid in it, but it wasn't actually wine.”

They added the compounds one at a time to their model wine, and asked trained tasters to clock how long it took flavors to fade. Fruity did indeed finish first—lasting a minute and a half. The others took 30 seconds longer to fade. And even when mixed with the other flavors, fruity still finished first—so the lore was right.

The study appears in the journal Food Quality and Preference. [Emily S. Goodstein et al, Perception of flavor finish in model white wine: A time-intensity study]

As for home tasters? “Pay attention to the finish, perhaps time it, if that's your thing.” It does happen to be ours.

—Christopher Intagliata

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]
 

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe