



Using computed tomography, researchers uncover the original molds for the royal sculpture
By Kate Wilcox | April 1, 2009 | 4
The famous bust of Nefertiti.
[Link to this slide]
The stars mark a more pronounced shading of the inner eyelid corners on the outer layer. It had been speculated that the bust was created more according to the beauty standards of the Amarna period in Egypt (circa 1340 B.C.), rather than in Nefertiti's likeness, but the shading revealed by the scans beneath the eyes shows she was aging....[More]
The stars mark a more pronounced shading of the inner eyelid corners on the outer layer. It had been speculated that the bust was created more according to the beauty standards of the Amarna period in Egypt (circa 1340 B.C.), rather than in Nefertiti's likeness, but the shading revealed by the scans beneath the eyes shows she was aging. The scientists speculate that the lines beneath her eyes were meant to show maturity and wisdom valued in that culture. [Less] [Link to this slide]
The arrows in the photo show the creases of the mouth in the inner layer, which are softer than those etched in the top layer. This suggests that the royal sculptor, Thutmose, provided more realistic details when he added the outer stucco layer....[More]
The arrows in the photo show the creases of the mouth in the inner layer, which are softer than those etched in the top layer. This suggests that the royal sculptor, Thutmose, provided more realistic details when he added the outer stucco layer. In ancient Egypt, women wore heavy layers of makeup to conceal wrinkles, so the fact that the sculptor added more wrinkles to the finished product supports the scientists' theory that the bust was designed to be a likeness of the queen rather than one sculpted to the beauty standards of the day. The slightly bumpy surface is caused by boundary artifacts between the stucco layer and limestone core. [Less] [Link to this slide]
The original layer of stucco, shaded in red, is only one to two millimeters (0.04 to 0.08 inch) thick; the stucco is thicker where the bust is most fragile at the rear of the crown and the top of the shoulders....[More]
The original layer of stucco, shaded in red, is only one to two millimeters (0.04 to 0.08 inch) thick; the stucco is thicker where the bust is most fragile at the rear of the crown and the top of the shoulders. [Less] [Link to this slide]
This image shows the more prominent cheekbones that were added with stucco.
[Link to this slide]
The outer layer is shown in red to highlight the differences between the inner and outer faces. The arrow points to the slight bump on the nose on the limestone core....[More]
The outer layer is shown in red to highlight the differences between the inner and outer faces. The arrow points to the slight bump on the nose on the limestone core. Removing the bump on the nose could have been done to enhance beauty, but the scientists speculate that in light of the other beauty-"detracting" changes, this change might also have been designed to make the bust more similar to the queen's actual appearance. [Less] [Link to this slide]
Most of the details for the ears, like the intricate auricular cavities, were done on the limestone.
[Link to this slide]
As opposed the pointed right ear, this one ends bluntly. Scientists suggest that this asymmetry is likely due not to craftsmanship but to damage the bust sustained at some point.
[Link to this slide]
YES! Send me a free issue of Scientific American with no obligation to continue the subscription. If I like it, I will be billed for the one-year subscription.
YES! Send me a free issue of Scientific American with no obligation to continue the subscription. If I like it, I will be billed for the one-year subscription.
4 Comments
Add CommentBeautiful images and surprisingly naturalistic. Many things have changed during the intervening 4 thousand years but our instinctual drive for beauty remains the same. I suspect those ears were just too delicate for limestone and so they were designed to sport some sort of jewelry...but I can easily see them becoming the genesis for a new fashion craze for modified ears.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisWhy does the caption for the inner face say "the creases of the mouth in the inner layer, which are softer than those etched in the top layer" -- when the pictures show more and deeper creases by far in the inner layer? The creases as shown in these images look considerably more smoothed out in the outer stucco layer. Add that the cheekbones were made more prominent in the outer layer, an almost imperceptible 'bump' on the nose was removed, and all this indicates to me a sort of early 'photoshopping' equivalent of the Queen to add back the bloom of youth. The inner layer as shown in these pictures seems to me more realistic in detail, and to a modern eye could represent someone for whom age was marking the years. Fascinating story.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisWorking in limestone with bronze tools would make it difficult to produce the subtle surface that one could create with an outer layer of stucco. I have no doubt that the artist chose this technique as a technical process much as one would use similar methods with modern materials for this result. Realise that much of Egyptian sculpture is ground to shape by subtractive and very slow painful work with natural abrasives on very resistant stone. This piece is an exception being in soft limestone and then additively worked with stucco. I cannot speak for the reasons for the differences between the inner and the outer image other than for artistic advantage but of these conclusions of mine, I am certain. I am a sculptor and what I see is quite a normal adjusting of the forms leading towards its conclusion as a finished work.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisthose old egyptians had much secrets, buried with them......
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thishope we add to science as they did but with no secrets