Subscription Center
The two-stroke rickshaw, although convenient in traffic-snarled cities, is a toxic nuisance--but new engines could clean up their act
April 6, 2012 | 14
Auto-rickshaws play an important role in urban transit in Asia, ferrying passengers to and from bus and train stops over the so-called "last mile." In India, cities with populations greater than four million boast as many as 50,000 of the three-wheeled vehicles....[More]
Demand for public transport in countries such as India exceeds supply as rural residents migrate to densely packed cities, such as Mumbai. India's urban population is expected to swell to 590 million by 2030, up from 340 million in 2008....[More]
Research suggests that auto-rickshaws are more affordable and accessible, although passenger safety remains a concern because of the open vehicle design.
[Link to this slide]
The word rickshaw is derived from the Japanese word jinrikisha, which means human-powered vehicle—like the pedal-powered one pictured here.
[Link to this slide]
More powerful rickshaws—like this large-capacity vehicle in Ujjain in Madhya Pradesh in India—are often used to transport cargo as well.
[Link to this slide]
 GAS: )
Alternative fuels such as compressed natural gas (CNG) can help cut soot emissions from auto-rickshaws, as demonstrated via air pollution levels in cities that have made the switch, such as Delhi and Mumbai....[More]
Electric rickshaws are gaining traction in some cities, such as Bangkok, but they remain more expensive than other options and a lack of charging stations—and reliable electricity—remain issues....[More]
YES! Send me a free issue of Scientific American with no obligation to continue the subscription. If I like it, I will be billed for the one-year subscription.
High Hopes for Hydrogen
Pumping Coal
How to Make the Food System More Energy Efficient
What Comes Next: Experts Predict the Future
Building a Better Biofuel: A New Carbon-Neutral Approach Turns Carbohydrates into Hydrocarbons
High-Pressure Hybrids: Fuel-Efficient Hydraulic Vehicles Come of Age
Obama Favors Plug-in Hybrids over Hydrogen Vehicles
Climate Talks Prove Growing Need for Carbon Capture and Storage Globally
YES! Send me a free issue of Scientific American with no obligation to continue the subscription. If I like it, I will be billed for the one-year subscription.
14 Comments
Add CommentWhy don't they make human powered city rickshaws with pedals in the back, too? I know with the driver and both my wife and I pedaling in the back, we could easily keep up with these two cycle menaces.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisCouple a battery/motor assist that's charged by regenerative braking to this planet-saver, and you've got a real solution.
althought the auto-rickshaw is very convenient for urban people,it is a mess for government to deal with the trafic problem.an transport system running under regulations is worth more consideration.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisA- Americans don't want to wait for a tuk-tuk.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisB- Americans are concerned more about peer image then conservation.
C- Americans can't drink and smoke in public transportation vehicles.
D- Carrying groceries farther then the carport of garage to the kitchen door is against the law in some gated communities.
E- Sharing space with stranger is as abhorrent as sharing a bag of french fries for the average American.
F- Everyone in America that owns a SUV will tell you that a tuk-tuk with five people on board is far more polluting then a vehicle getting 18 miles to the gallon empty and heading down wind.
G- Americans would rather pay to park and walk to shop then get dropped off at the front door and risk being seen buy their friends or co-workers.
I could go one to the latter half of the alphabet, but I am sure most people will get the picture by now.
If tuk-tuks were electric powered, offered air conditioning and scantily clad hostesses serving free cocktails and lunch, Americans still wouldn't give up their gas guzzlers.
although the new engines appear "cleaner" . The emissions of nanoparticles have increased. That makes them more genetically / cardiovascular dangerous.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisThere are many alternative engines for that kind of vehicles, and also exhaust emission reducing catalyzers have greatly reduced its cost, but in the general field of this tiny transport means, an issue remains open to me: Am I right in thinking that human traction was long ago considered an unnacceptable way of anything but taking yourself?. Salut +
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisTwo-stroke engines are just dirty oddities, good for nothing but industrial archeology museums.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisI drive a Trike the same size, power, speed except I use EV drive from a golf cart hot rodded with larger tires, higher voltage battery pack.
Such a vehicle would do this service extremely well at 20% to run vs a gas, NG vehicle.
While 4 strokes are better than 2 strokes they still pollute fairly bad in taxi service and still such gas which is $5-10/gal in these countries. Unlikely most are getting over 50 mpg which would cost $.50 in electricity and $.25 in battery. Prices are an average guess but likely close.
So saving $4.50 or more/day quickly pays for the conversion which is rather simple though about $1500 so would be paid for in fuel savings in just a yr.
Fast charging stations can be cheaply set up to charge them to 80% in just 15 minutes for $.50 and can profitably use solar PV now their price has dropped so much and the price doesn't have to ever go up if the taxi owners own the charge station. The above and new light EV's are buy far the most profitable and least poluting they can get.
BTW 2 strokes can be clean but expensive needing direct injection and other goodies. But even if clean they still cost big time at the pump.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisI forgot EV's are far better accelerating with 3x's the torque of an ICE or more. I tow a 13' trailer filled with plywood and 2x4's, 4x4's, etc.
I guess I should mention too mine is made of plywood and epoxy giving a very light and strong chassis that holds the batteries and the suspension bolts to. It's set up as a pickup, 3x4 bed with a trailer hitch for larger loads.
It uses a MC ot moped front end and can go up to 50mph. With a car diff and bigger motor you can get most any speed you want though it better be aero if you want range at speed.
It costs me $2/wk for everything, fuel, battery, tires, tag which is my biggest expense. It gets 33wthrs/mile means a kwhr gets me 30 miles/kwhr and a Kwhr costs me the US average of $.10kwhr. So for $1 of electricity I get 300 miles.
For the price of 1 US gal of gasoline I can go 1200 miles now the price is $4/gal.
Can the 'experts' please elaborate.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisIs the comparison between car and rickshaw done with same fuel.
Cars are having four stroke engines and are (petrol,diesel) based
CNG based auto rickshaws nowadays are having 4-stroke engine. But the old rickshaws were having 2-stroke engines.
Many car owners also fit CNG/LPG kits in the cars.
So is the comparison by 'experts' done only considering Liquid fuel based cars?
What about kite powered rickshaws? Only joking! Has anyone realised that particulates are carbon, that has not been combined with oxygen, to make CO2. So, why not capture the particulates either Dyson style centrifugal action, or by passing the exhaust through water?
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thispokerplay hits the nail squarely on the head. The root cause of many of the worlds problems is overpopulation, and the worlds population is increasing every day.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thissingingflea has got it exactly right. Most Americans don't give a rats backside about the rest of the world, or about environmental pollution, and many of them don't even know where the rest of the world is.
Since the major problem with the Tuk-Tuks is the two stroke engine it would be possible to make a four stroke engine which could be a "drop in" replacement for the four stroke engine.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisAlso since the major problem with the two stroke engine is the "total loss" lubrication system (oil is added to the fuel to lubricate the engine) it is possible to build a two stroke engine using fuel injection and to replace the crankcase compression system of delivering air to the cylinder. This could theoretically be better than a four stroke engine as there would be a power stroke every revolution instead of a power stroke taking two revolutions as in the four stroke engine.
You say "the root cause of many of the world's problems is overpopulation, and the world's population is increasing everyday". As you are free, you can add to the solution of what you think is the cause of exhaust gas emissions from obsolete technologies in developing countries: refrain from reproducing and add to the world no more offspring from you right now. For this you'll need a full sexual abstinence, as there's no 100% efficacious approach to family planning. Salut +
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisI also agree that ICEs are not the future, but it may be with us for another 20 to 50 years. We should not forget that electric car is only as clean as the source of electricity. Generating electricity from coal and powering the present time obese and aerodynamically poor vehicles, - makes no sense at all.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisOnce we start to produce electricity from clean and renewable sources, and batteries attain the power/energy density comparable to liquid fuels, obviously the choice will be electric. So far it is a shift from oil and gas... to coal. And that is not clearly explained to consumers... That is too bad.