• Share
  • Email
  •  1 of 7  
MONUMENT:
thumb: MONUMENT:
MONUMENT:

This daguerreotype of the Amos Binney Monument in Mount Auburn Cemetery also began to cloud over within a month on display.

[Link to this slide]
George Eastman House Study Collection
UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN:
thumb: UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN:
UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN:

The daguerreotype of this unidentified woman was taken around 1850. After only a month on display a haze began to appear over much of the darker portions of the image.

[Link to this slide]
George Eastman House Study Collection
HENRY I. BODWICH:
thumb: HENRY I. BODWICH:
HENRY I. BODWICH:

This portrait of abolitionist Henry I. Bowdich developed both hazing and spots during the 2005 exhibition.

[Link to this slide]
George Eastman House Study Collection
UNIDENTIFIED MAN:
thumb: UNIDENTIFIED MAN:

UNIDENTIFIED MAN:

This plate has significant deterioration from being in a case with excess humidity. The cover glass decomposed and the alkaline salts became hydrated on its interior and dripped onto the plate creating alkaline bi-metallic corrosion or a battery effect....[More]

UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN AND CHILD:
thumb: UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN AND CHILD:

UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN AND CHILD:

This daguerreotype has multiple forms of corrosion or oxidation covering the entire image. This sort of deterioration is caused by sources of sulfur in the vicinity of the daguerreotype or other factors that might form silver oxide as well as light-induced silver reduction if chlorides are present on the surface....[More]

UNIDENTIFIED COUPLE
thumb: UNIDENTIFIED COUPLE

UNIDENTIFIED COUPLE

This daguerreotype exhibits deterioration arising from chemical cleaning with a thiourea solution: commonly known as silver dip often used to clean flatware....[More]

UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN:
thumb: UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN:

UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN:

Daguerreotype was acquired without an original case or protective enclosure. The deterioration arises from many undetermined sources: physical damage from scratching and handling; streaks and hazing from atmospheric attack, including moisture and pollutants....[More]

risk free title graphic

YES! Send me a free issue of Scientific American with no obligation to continue the subscription. If I like it, I will be billed for the one-year subscription.

cover image
ADVERTISEMENT

4 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. Tefft 09:30 PM 12/15/12

    I have one Dag photo of my great Grand father and wife and kids befor my grandfather was born. It is in pretty good shape, What can I do to keep it in good form?? Is there something we can do besides putting it in a nitrogen invironment??? Jerry jrtefft@yahoo.com

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. h2mac 08:29 AM 12/16/12

    Is it Bodwich or Bowdich? Two different spellings in the caption.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. jack.123 11:56 PM 12/18/12

    How did these pictures last up till now?Where and how were they kept in good form until now?This may answer why decay is now occurring.The article doesn't explain how they were stored until now.There was a lot of missing information in the story,and I have been seeing many half done articles like this in Sciam lately.Why?

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  4. 4. daguerreian artist 11:27 AM 1/11/13


    From personal experience I can tell you that I have 19th century daguerreotypes as well as my own daguerreotypes that have been on continuous display on my studio wall for 10+ years with no sign of change.

    Southworth and Hawes plates have a very unique storage history contrary to the norm. The great majority of S&H images that remain were plates retained by the studio stored completely unsealed in plate boxes. A typical preservation package used by the George Eastman House from the mid-1970's to 1999 consisted of 4-ply buffered board with a paper binding tape, and a buffered die cut paper mat separating the plate from the glass. The buffering agent is 3% calcium carbonate to provide an alkali reserve of ph 8.5.

    I have experienced the "white haze" phenomena on other of my contemporary images as well as on 19th century images that have been in contact with buffered board. What is good for the conservation of paper, ie alkaline buffering, is not necessarily good for daguerreotypes.

    In reviewing the conservation efforts for the Young America Exhibition I learned that plates were not removed from their mat board and die cut preservation packages. These were placed intact into extremely well sealed secondary housings incorporating shallow copper pans to act as pollutant scavengers. A complete overview of the conservation for this exhibition can be found here.
    http://notesonphotographs.org/images/1/1e/Young_America_design_for_web.pdf

    If the buffered materials are a co-factor in the formation of "white-haze" deterioration it would explain why even with the best intentioned conservation, some plates still changed during exhibition. A questionable environment was enclosed within a stable one.
    This scenario is a possible alternative and/or co-factor to the silver-chloride scenario presented in the Scientific American article.

    Daguerreotypes are among the most stable of photographs providing the housings are intact to prevent pollutants from reacting with the silver surface and the housings themselves are not contributing to the problem. The mechanism of deterioration particular to a small percentage of Southworth and Hawes daguerreotypes is not yet fully understood. This article should not prevent us from exhibiting these amazing photographs. It is prudent, as has been shown by the Young America exhibition, to accurately document any daguerreotype intended for exhibition and carefully monitor it at regular intervals to note any changes.

    sincerely,

    Mike Robinson
    President of the Daguerreian Society

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.
Advertisement

Email this Article

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X