Subscription Center
Researchers are developing cameras that can take digital snapshots made up of more than a billion pixels
January 6, 2011 | 17
Columbia University researchers propose three relatively compact camera designs for single-snapshot gigapixel imaging. Each design relies on a ball-shaped lens because it has perfect symmetry (leading to fewer aberrations) and consists of one element rather than several lenses that must be configured to work together, says Oliver Cossairt, a Columbia University computer science PhD candidate working on the project as part of his dissertation....[More]
The first prototype camera that the Columbia University researchers created is a single-element, monocentric camera that uses a pan/tilt motor to sequentially scan a single sensor to emulate an array of tiled sensors....[More]
The second camera designed by the Columbia researchers is a system that actually uses an array of five sensors arranged side-by-side that produces a contiguous field-of-view (FOV)....[More]
The third design attaches secondary relay lenses directly to half of the ball-shaped lens (giving it a bumpy rather than a smooth look) and includes a large number of small sensors around that half of the lens....[More]
)
In the proposed third design, sensors could be attached to the inside of a spherical half shell slightly larger than the lens itself. The spherical lens would then be positioned inside the half shell so that each sensor would be coupled with a relay lens....[More]
The researchers have several examples of gigapixel digital images taken using their technology. This one shows the New York City skyline, as seen from nearby Governor's Island....[More]
YES! Send me a free issue of Scientific American with no obligation to continue the subscription. If I like it, I will be billed for the one-year subscription.
Space Wars - Coming to the Sky Near You?
Can You Live Forever? Maybe Not--But You Can Have Fun Trying
A Brief History of Plastic's Conquest of the World
How Science Stopped BP's Gulf of Mexico Oil Spill
50 Years Ago: Nerve Cells Talking
Self-Cleaning Materials: Lotus Leaf-Inspired Nanotechnology
How We Know That Humans Are Getting Smarter [Excerpt]
Aviator's Dilemma: Pilots Encounter Illusions Everywhere
YES! Send me a free issue of Scientific American with no obligation to continue the subscription. If I like it, I will be billed for the one-year subscription.
17 Comments
Add CommentIf I understand correctly, in the example described a motor would be rotating a spherical lens within a sensor housing. This process would reintroduce a delay factor to photography, requiring the subject to remain motionless as the picture is being 'exposed'. Don't move!
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisI just saw the slide show. I'm not sure that all the suggested designs incur any mechanical delay, but the impact for those that do of course depends of the duration of that delay.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisThe last slide in the show includes an image of a person that appears to be walking. I suspect that the worst case would be for objects that are moving in the same direction as the sensor unit, at proportionally similar speeds. In that case I'd expect to see 'streaking' of those moving objects appearing across multiple pixel exposures.
http://www.gigapxl.org/project.htm
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisThe photos in the story hardly do justice to the true ability of the technology check it out on there website.
It seems that similar lens/senor positioning methods could be used to produce nanoscale cameras with high, perhaps megapixel, resolution. You know, for those tiny bugs...
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisKH 11
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisIf they are reading this the site referenced has a picture labeled "Seattle OR" which of course should be Seattle, WA. I worked with a Rollei close-range photogrammetry system, a medium-format camera, though 35mm was also available, in development as Intel 386 math chips made the process available from a number of photos registered on a large tablet which allowed 3D measurements from software to be obtained from a sequence of photos, (or photo) with the factory documented camera and lens for aberration or distortion. I think this method might aid the science of close-range photogrammetry, where very accurate measurements are needed. Was that pipe on the oil platform, to be replaced, as it was on the "blueprint", or how much needs to be adjusted, or other uses, accidents, preservation. "as-builts" etc.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisGigapixel photography owes much to Dr.Graham Flint (see gigapxl.org & Google him) & the earlier U2 & satellite technology he helped develop & still uses. Newer technology (& eventual lower costs) may make these techniques more widely available in the near future. RBinSC
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisA question for consumer applications of a gigapixel photography; where would you archive these photos?
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisI understand government and spy uses. It's the family reunion that is of concern.
Of course, like the 4MP cameras of a decade ago, progress will happen.
As someone who worked with satellite pictures during the Vietnam War, I find this technology amazing. We had to launch very heavy, low-earth-orbit satellites from Vandenberg AFB, and the film was returned to earth in capsules that were captured in mid-air over the South Pacific. The resolution was breathtaking.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisThis new methodology, even with its drawbacks, sounds far faster, and as for cost, I do not imagine it is possible for it to be as expensive as a Titan liquid-fuel rocket with multiple solid-fuel strap-on boosters.
A gigabyte picture on an iphone sounds like just the sort of gizmo that technology victims will leap at.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisthis is a ver interesting article, thanks
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisalex garza
http://photoshopquickly.com/
You can host and archive gigapixel images now via GigaPan.org (publicly or privately). (disclaimer, I work for GigaPan :-)
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisThis is a good example: http://gigapan.org/gigapans/67894/
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisFor a project in which we have 10 to 15 seconds to take gigapixel images, and would like to take at least 3 or 4, how much write time does each image take?
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisSo how much do these cameras cost?
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisWhere do you Buy these?
Quite amazing, I would assume that the movement of the sensor was similar in speed and function to a focal plane shutter used in many 35 mm cameras, which I find kinda ironic.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisI am also curious how they deal with noise from so many pixels
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this