Slide Shows | Energy & Sustainability

How to Tear Down a Nuclear Power Plant [Slide Show]

What happens to nuclear reactors like those at Fukushima after they melt down or reach the end of their useful lives?

  • Share
  • Email
  •  1 of 13  
FUKUSHIMA MELTDOWN:
thumb: FUKUSHIMA MELTDOWN:

FUKUSHIMA MELTDOWN:

On March 11, a magnitude 9.0 earthquake spawned a 14-meter-tall tsunami that swept over the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant on the northeast coast of Honshu, Japan's main island....[More]

CALM BEFORE THE STORM:
thumb: CALM BEFORE THE STORM:
CALM BEFORE THE STORM:

As the tsunami hit, the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant was already shutting down as a result of safety precautions triggered by the earthquake.

[Link to this slide]
Courtesy of TEPCO
TSUNAMI:
thumb: TSUNAMI:

TSUNAMI:

The 14-meter-high wall of water easily overtopped the nuclear power plant's seawall and flooded access roads as well as swept away fuel tanks for backup diesel generators....[More]

SPENT FUEL:
thumb: SPENT FUEL:

SPENT FUEL:

Not only did the fuel in the operating reactors begin to melt down, but so did spent fuel stored in nearby pools. Such a pool sparked a hydrogen explosion at the plant's reactor No....[More]

RESTORING CONTROL:
thumb: RESTORING CONTROL:

RESTORING CONTROL:

As a result of the explosions at the three operating reactors, radiation levels spiked, forcing the evacuation of control rooms at the nuclear power plant, like the one for reactor No....[More]

SHIELDING:
thumb: SHIELDING:

SHIELDING:

In order to protect workers from high levels of radiation, various forms of plastic shielding and special breathing apparatus are required (pictured)....[More]

COOLING WATER:
thumb: COOLING WATER:

COOLING WATER:

The first priority in getting the Fukushima meltdown under control is applying cooling water to the hot nuclear fuel. Here workers employ a tall pumping crane (more commonly used to pump concrete into the upper stories of tall buildings under construction) to spray water onto the hot fuel....[More]

WATER STORAGE:
thumb: WATER STORAGE:
WATER STORAGE:

The water that is not simply released into the atmosphere as steam or dumped in the ocean is stored in these big tanks, awaiting filtration and cleanup.

[Link to this slide]
Courtesy of TEPCO
DECOMMISSION:
thumb: DECOMMISSION:

DECOMMISSION:

Once the nuclear fuel is cool, workers will attempt to tear down the stricken nuclear power plant using remote-controlled heavy machinery like the power shovel and dump truck on tank treads pictured here....[More]

REMOTE CONTROL:
thumb: REMOTE CONTROL:

REMOTE CONTROL:

Because of the high radiation levels around the plant, even the cleanup of the detritus from the tsunami must be done remotely (pictured), and workers must wear full protective gear, including breathing apparatus....[More]

ROBOT RELIEF:
thumb: ROBOT RELIEF:

ROBOT RELIEF:

To get a better idea of radiation levels and damage in places that humans cannot go, robots with radiation hardened electronics have been used, like the PackBot pictured here opening a door at Fukushima Daiichi....[More]

RADIOACTIVE PARTICLES:
thumb: RADIOACTIVE PARTICLES:

RADIOACTIVE PARTICLES:

Because the fuel rod meltdowns were not entirely contained, radioactive particles, such as cesium 137, have escaped into the surrounding environment, including towns as far as 30 kilometers away....[More]

DRY CASK:
thumb: DRY CASK:

DRY CASK:

Ultimately, years later, spent fuel rods that have not melted down can be shifted into massive casks, like the one pictured here, for semipermanent storage....[More]

risk free title graphic

YES! Send me a free issue of Scientific American with no obligation to continue the subscription. If I like it, I will be billed for the one-year subscription.

cover image
ADVERTISEMENT

3 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. nstricker 12:56 PM 4/29/11

    Hello, I am a science writer at Idaho National Lab and want to say that Mr. Biello did a really nice job on this article. It's well researched and written.

    However, there's one small problem with one of the quotes from INL's Doug Akers. On page 3, it says: "Only 3 to 4 percent of the reactor inventory [of radioactive material] was released," Akers says.... It should say that only 3 to 4 percent of the reactor inventory of noble gases was released, whereas effectively all the other fission products (including plutonium and uranium) were retained in the containment or in the reactor vessel.

    Thanks for the opportunity to clarify this information.
    Nicole Stricker, Idaho National Lab

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. KaiGeologist 02:54 AM 5/6/11

    Some low dose radiation is not dangerous, it can even make you healthier?
    Quick doses under 100 mSv and longer term doses under some thousand mSv/year are not dangerous.
    Chernobyl experience tells that.
    Small micrometer sized particles from coal, oil, wood, biomassa burning,.. are much more dangerous- millions of people die every year because of these...
    See more
    www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2592992/
    www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/ppmc/articles/PMC2889503/

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. eco-steve 10:04 AM 5/15/11

    Who is going to pay for environmental damage that is being done by dirty technology? The question is not whether nuclear is safer than coal. Both need to be replaced by clean technology.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.
Advertisement

Email this Article

X
Scientific American MIND iPad

Tap into your MIND

Get Both Print & Tablet Editions for one low price!

Subscribe Now >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X