Slide Shows | Space

A Decade on the Fly: Building the International Space Station--Module by Module [Slide Show]

Between 1998 and 2010 the station evolved from a single Russian module to a behemoth orbital outpost the size of a football field

  • Share
  • Email
  •  2 of 10  
FIRST THING FIRST
thumb: FIRST THING FIRST

FIRST THING FIRST

This photo was taken from space shuttle Endeavour on approach to the unmanned, Russian-built Zarya module during the STS-88 mission in December 1998....[More]

TWO'S COMPANY
thumb: TWO'S COMPANY

TWO'S COMPANY

The STS-88 mission delivered to orbit a U.S. passageway module known as Unity [ right ], which was attached to Zarya [ left ] and then released. ...[More]

PIECE BY PIECE
thumb: PIECE BY PIECE

PIECE BY PIECE

In July 2000 another Russian component was delivered to orbit by a Proton rocket. The Zvezda service module [ the pictured module with the largest solar wingspan ] linked to the existing Zarya module and provided working and sleeping quarters for future crew members....[More]

TAKING WING
thumb: TAKING WING

TAKING WING

By December 2000 the ISS had already been crewed for a month. That month, space shuttle mission STS-97 delivered to the station its first set of solar arrays, or "wings," to generate power for onboard activities....[More]

ONE-ARMED BANDIT
thumb: ONE-ARMED BANDIT

ONE-ARMED BANDIT

The crew of STS-110 snapped this photograph in 2002 after space shuttle Atlantis pulled away from the station. The extended appendage at the bottom of the photo is the Canadarm2, an articulated robotic arm built by the Canadian Space Agency that was installed in 2001....[More]

BACK TO WORK
thumb: BACK TO WORK

BACK TO WORK

On February 1, 2003, space shuttle Columbia broke apart during atmospheric reentry following a research mission, killing all seven crew members on board....[More]

BALANCE OF POWER
thumb: BALANCE OF POWER

BALANCE OF POWER

In 2007 the STS-117 mission delivered the ISS's third set of solar array wings. (Only two are visible here; one set was retracted until relocation during a later mission.) The above photograph was taken during space shuttle Atlantis 's inspection fly-around following the solar upgrade....[More]

SPACE SCIENCE
thumb: SPACE SCIENCE

SPACE SCIENCE

The STS-122 mission in February 2008 delivered the Columbus laboratory module for the European Space Agency (ESA). In this view from space shuttle Atlantis following undocking with the ISS, the newly installed Columbus is visible as a cylinder jutting off to the left at the bottom of the station....[More]

BRANCHING OUT
thumb: BRANCHING OUT

BRANCHING OUT

By September 2009, when this photograph from space shuttle Discovery was taken toward the end of the STS-128 mission, the ISS had its full complement of solar array wings and stretched more than 100 meters....[More]

SPACE SPRAWL
thumb: SPACE SPRAWL

SPACE SPRAWL

Shuttle astronauts have not visited the ISS since May, when space shuttle Atlantis delivered a Russian-built research module during STS-132. The photo above shows how the station looked on approach during that mission....[More]

risk free title graphic

YES! Send me a free issue of Scientific American with no obligation to continue the subscription. If I like it, I will be billed for the one-year subscription.

cover image
ADVERTISEMENT

5 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. dbtinc 05:03 PM 11/2/10

    here goes - and what pray tell has been the outcome of this multi-billion dollar fiasco? At least we got Tang from the original space program. Let's spend our limited resources on unmanned missions - they have been beyond spectacular and have made contributions to science.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. DaleEMoore 09:25 PM 11/2/10

    I say we build the space elevator next.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. jimboagogo 04:31 PM 11/3/10

    Way cheaper than Afghanistan...and it got the Hubble fixed!

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  4. 4. Wayne Williamson 08:17 PM 11/3/10

    The idea behind ISS is very nobel...so cool having many countries contribute to a huge endeavor...

    dbtinc...In some ways I agree...In the short term, bang for the buck goes to unmanned probes....In the long term, if human kind is to have a permanent presence in space we need to understand the impacts of zero g...then again in the long term...hopefully its not necessary...

    DaleEMoore...If we can get materials that are strong enough it is definitely the way to go....it would be a huge engineering feat...probably several spread around the equator....

    jimboagogo...I was going to post that the ISS had cost in the Trillions...but on further research I see your on target(~160 billion)...ps the ISS did not fix the hubble...that was the space shuttle crews and payloads...

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  5. 5. robert schmidt 09:25 PM 11/4/10

    @dbtinc, "and what pray tell has been the outcome of this multi-billion dollar fiasco" hey, it is ok if you are ignorant but don't jump to the conclusion it was a "fiasco" just because you haven't taken the time to understand the contribution the ISS has made to science and technology. You sound like one of those money grubbing republicans who doesn't consider anything worthwhile unless it pads his personal pockets. If that is the case, science isn't for you, science is about acquiring knowledge not about creating wealth.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.
Advertisement

Email this Article

X
Scientific American MIND iPad

Tap into your MIND

Get Both Print & Tablet Editions for one low price!

Subscribe Now >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X