



The enhanced system at Soultz in France is the first such artificial geothermal power plant
By Eitan Haddok and David Biello | February 17, 2009 | 7
Soultz-sous-Forêts's enhanced geothermal power plant involved drilling two pairs of boreholes down to deep, fractured rock—one from each pair in which hot fluid is extracted to deliver its calories and the others into which the cooled fluid is injected after it is used to make electricity....[More]
Soultz-sous-Forêts's enhanced geothermal power plant involved drilling two pairs of boreholes down to deep, fractured rock—one from each pair in which hot fluid is extracted to deliver its calories and the others into which the cooled fluid is injected after it is used to make electricity. [Less] [Link to this slide]
Soultz-sous-Forêts is located in France's northern Alsace region, an area known geologically as the Rhine Graben, which contains the perfect rock for human-engineered geothermal energy....[More]
Soultz-sous-Forêts is located in France's northern Alsace region, an area known geologically as the Rhine Graben, which contains the perfect rock for human-engineered geothermal energy. Similar sites exist from Indonesia to Nevada. [Less] [Link to this slide]
Such triple-head drills, known as Tricone bits, are used to drive boreholes some 16,400 feet (5,000 meters) deep beneath the surface, opening the way for an eight-inch- (20-centimeter-) wide pipe.
[Link to this slide]
The granite 16,400 feet (5,000 meters) down is roughly 392 degrees Fahrenheit (200 degrees Celsius), and has been transformed by faulting and deep hydrothermal fluids into a softer, crumbly rock susceptible to fracturing....[More]
The granite 16,400 feet (5,000 meters) down is roughly 392 degrees Fahrenheit (200 degrees Celsius), and has been transformed by faulting and deep hydrothermal fluids into a softer, crumbly rock susceptible to fracturing. Hydrochloric acid and water are injected to clean and reopen those fractures, says geologist Albert Genter, scientific coordinator of the project.
In June 2003, injections of pressurized water produced a magnitude 2.9 earthquake, causing concern among local residents, but today acid injection has proved to avoid such negative effects. [Less] [Link to this slide]
At a depth of 14,763 feet (4,500 meters), the fluid—briny water found at that depth—flows through an eight-inch- (20-centimeter-) wide pipe before being released into the rock and migrating another 1,640 feet (5,000 meters) deeper....[More]
At a depth of 14,763 feet (4,500 meters), the fluid—briny water found at that depth—flows through an eight-inch- (20-centimeter-) wide pipe before being released into the rock and migrating another 1,640 feet (5,000 meters) deeper. The rock there is 392 degrees F (200 degrees C) and the fluid migrates about 2,000 feet (600 meters) through it and then is sucked into the extraction pipe.
Back at the top 90 minutes later, the solution is still a liquid, but is now roughly 338 degrees F (170 degrees C)—ready to transfer its heat to spin a turbine to generate electricity. This power source is available at all times, delivering a dependable supply of electricity unlike other renewables such as wind and solar. [Less] [Link to this slide]
Because the briny water is three times as concentrated as the ocean—13 ounces of salt per gallon (100 grams per liter)—and carries dissolved metals and minerals, as well, it can quickly plug the piping....[More]
Because the briny water is three times as concentrated as the ocean—13 ounces of salt per gallon (100 grams per liter)—and carries dissolved metals and minerals, as well, it can quickly plug the piping. So the water is filtered and salt-resistant coatings cover all the pipes and exchange systems. [Less] [Link to this slide]
Nevertheless, the heat exchangers require periodic cleaning to remove fragments of rocks brought up with the fluid. And hydrochloric acid or other chemical "cocktails" can be added to prevent dissolved sediments from clogging the injection well....[More]
Nevertheless, the heat exchangers require periodic cleaning to remove fragments of rocks brought up with the fluid. And hydrochloric acid or other chemical "cocktails" can be added to prevent dissolved sediments from clogging the injection well. [Less] [Link to this slide]
Engineer Jean-Jacques Graff, director of the site, and geologist Albert Genter, under the drilling derrick GPK2, discuss how long Soultz-sous-Forêts might produce energy....[More]
Engineer Jean-Jacques Graff, director of the site, and geologist Albert Genter, under the drilling derrick GPK2, discuss how long Soultz-sous-Forêts might produce energy. Eventually, the action of the water will cool the rock to the temperature where there will not be enough heat energy to spin turbines.
But as it turns out, they actually drilled too deep; turbines can now produce electricity at temperatures as low as 248 degrees F (120 degrees C), which would have necessitated drilling only 9,840 feet (3,000 meters) down. "Even when the rock at a depth of 5,000 meters [16,400 feet] will lose its thermal capacity," Graff says, "it will still be possible to pierce the pipe higher, at around 3,000 meters, because the truth is that we went too deep in that pilot." [Less] [Link to this slide]
All told, the 1.5 megawatts of electricity cost $64.5 million (50 million euros) for research and construction, but the system could potentially produce as much as three megawatts....[More]
All told, the 1.5 megawatts of electricity cost $64.5 million (50 million euros) for research and construction, but the system could potentially produce as much as three megawatts. Electricity could be delivered to the grid for 31 cents (0.24 euro) per kilowatt-hour, according to Graff, though the project is designed to remain simply an experimental prototype.
But the residual heat in the water could also be used to heat greenhouses, such as is being done in Iceland—getting more heat out of every gallon (liter) and making the energy source even more attractive. [Less] [Link to this slide]
YES! Send me a free issue of Scientific American with no obligation to continue the subscription. If I like it, I will be billed for the one-year subscription.
Hey, Green Spender: Top 100 Eco-Barons
Where Do the Presidential Candidates Stand on Environment and Energy?
YES! Send me a free issue of Scientific American with no obligation to continue the subscription. If I like it, I will be billed for the one-year subscription.
7 Comments
Add CommentHeadline should read "...One kilowatt-hour at a time."
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisKilowatts measure power, kilowatt-hours measure energy. I hate to nitpick, but it's in the headline, and it's a very common mistake for all news media to make. When will the companies you expect to do better, well-edited international newspapers and science mags, learn?
Rated power can be considered a measure of maximum instantaneous capacity of a plant, and energy the cumulative value of the output of the plant.
Alaska is in a very poor location for geothermal power, but yet, they have geothermal power which saves them millions of dollars a year in utility bills. Why can't each state follow Alaska's lead and build a geothermal plant that will provide all the clean energy they will ever need, and it could be very cheap to all the states citizens where they can afford to heat their homes and businesses in the winter time.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisIs there a danger of causing long term problems by tapping into these hot rocks beneath? I can't put my finger on it exactly, but it strikes me as somewhat hazardous to drill lots of holes deep into the ground everywhere. I hope my worries are unfounded, as this does sound like the very fairytale of all energy sources.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisIs there a danger of causing long term problems by tapping into these hot rocks beneath? I can't put my finger on it exactly, but it strikes me as somewhat hazardous to drill lots of holes deep into the ground everywhere. I hope my worries are unfounded, as this does sound like the very fairytale of all energy sources.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisWith over 1,000,000 old oil wells in the continental US, it is very likely that some of these could be re-entered, cleaned up, and re-completed as hot water wells dedicated to geothermal power production. I'm willing to bet that the USGS even has on file the bottom-hole temperatures of most of these wells plus geothermal gradient maps that show subsurface temperature trends at depth. I concur with James Davis' comments.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisGeothermal. The only way to go! Constant, no doubt about baseload. Non polluting - no gas, solid or radioactive storage problems. No energy storage problem. No possible nuclear accident worry. Only problem is location and energy transport - both only transit loss - so what?
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisHi, I am helen
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thishow are you,hope you are fine and in perfect condition of health. I went through your profile and I read it and took interest in it,please if you don't mind I will like you to write me on this ID(helenyak11@yahoo.com)hope to hear from you soon,and I will be waiting for your mail because I have something VERY important to tell you. Never in my wildest dreams did I ever believe this would ever happen. I never expected to fall so deeply in love so fast. It all started after reading profile first. Lots of love helen