Slide Shows | Energy & Sustainability

Man-Made Geothermal Power: Wresting Energy from Hot Rocks--One Kilowatt at a Time [Slide Show]

The enhanced system at Soultz in France is the first such artificial geothermal power plant

  • Share
  • Email
  •  1 of 9  
TERRA WATTS:
thumb: TERRA WATTS:

TERRA WATTS:

Soultz-sous-Forêts's enhanced geothermal power plant involved drilling two pairs of boreholes down to deep, fractured rock—one from each pair in which hot fluid is extracted to deliver its calories and the others into which the cooled fluid is injected after it is used to make electricity....[More]

HOT ROCKS:
thumb: HOT ROCKS:

HOT ROCKS:

Soultz-sous-Forêts is located in France's northern Alsace region, an area known geologically as the Rhine Graben, which contains the perfect rock for human-engineered geothermal energy....[More]

DRILL BIT:
thumb: DRILL BIT:
DRILL BIT:

Such triple-head drills, known as Tricone bits, are used to drive boreholes some 16,400 feet (5,000 meters) deep beneath the surface, opening the way for an eight-inch- (20-centimeter-) wide pipe.

[Link to this slide]
© EITAN HADDOK
GRANITE FLOOR:
thumb: GRANITE FLOOR:

GRANITE FLOOR:

The granite 16,400 feet (5,000 meters) down is roughly 392 degrees Fahrenheit (200 degrees Celsius), and has been transformed by faulting and deep hydrothermal fluids into a softer, crumbly rock susceptible to fracturing....[More]

LAYING PIPE:
thumb: LAYING PIPE:

LAYING PIPE:

At a depth of 14,763 feet (4,500 meters), the fluid—briny water found at that depth—flows through an eight-inch- (20-centimeter-) wide pipe before being released into the rock and migrating another 1,640 feet (5,000 meters) deeper....[More]

HARSH BREW:
thumb: HARSH BREW:

HARSH BREW:

Because the briny water is three times as concentrated as the ocean—13 ounces of salt per gallon (100 grams per liter)—and carries dissolved metals and minerals, as well, it can quickly plug the piping....[More]

CLEANING HOUSE:
thumb: CLEANING HOUSE:

CLEANING HOUSE:

Nevertheless, the heat exchangers require periodic cleaning to remove fragments of rocks brought up with the fluid. And hydrochloric acid or other chemical "cocktails" can be added to prevent dissolved sediments from clogging the injection well....[More]

SUSTAINABLE SOURCE?:
thumb: SUSTAINABLE SOURCE?:

SUSTAINABLE SOURCE?:

Engineer Jean-Jacques Graff, director of the site, and geologist Albert Genter, under the drilling derrick GPK2, discuss how long Soultz-sous-Forêts might produce energy....[More]

ROCKY ECONOMICS?:
thumb: ROCKY ECONOMICS?:

ROCKY ECONOMICS?:

All told, the 1.5 megawatts of electricity cost $64.5 million (50 million euros) for research and construction, but the system could potentially produce as much as three megawatts....[More]

risk free title graphic

YES! Send me a free issue of Scientific American with no obligation to continue the subscription. If I like it, I will be billed for the one-year subscription.

cover image
ADVERTISEMENT

6 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. InquiringConstructivist 12:51 AM 2/18/09

    Headline should read "...One kilowatt-hour at a time."
    Kilowatts measure power, kilowatt-hours measure energy. I hate to nitpick, but it's in the headline, and it's a very common mistake for all news media to make. When will the companies you expect to do better, well-edited international newspapers and science mags, learn?
    Rated power can be considered a measure of maximum instantaneous capacity of a plant, and energy the cumulative value of the output of the plant.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. JamesDavis 08:16 AM 2/18/09

    Alaska is in a very poor location for geothermal power, but yet, they have geothermal power which saves them millions of dollars a year in utility bills. Why can't each state follow Alaska's lead and build a geothermal plant that will provide all the clean energy they will ever need, and it could be very cheap to all the states citizens where they can afford to heat their homes and businesses in the winter time.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. Ian 03:54 PM 2/21/09

    Is there a danger of causing long term problems by tapping into these hot rocks beneath? I can't put my finger on it exactly, but it strikes me as somewhat hazardous to drill lots of holes deep into the ground everywhere. I hope my worries are unfounded, as this does sound like the very fairytale of all energy sources.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  4. 4. Ian 03:55 PM 2/21/09

    Is there a danger of causing long term problems by tapping into these hot rocks beneath? I can't put my finger on it exactly, but it strikes me as somewhat hazardous to drill lots of holes deep into the ground everywhere. I hope my worries are unfounded, as this does sound like the very fairytale of all energy sources.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  5. 5. bill.brumbaugh@bigfoot.com 12:12 PM 4/18/09

    With over 1,000,000 old oil wells in the continental US, it is very likely that some of these could be re-entered, cleaned up, and re-completed as hot water wells dedicated to geothermal power production. I'm willing to bet that the USGS even has on file the bottom-hole temperatures of most of these wells plus geothermal gradient maps that show subsurface temperature trends at depth. I concur with James Davis' comments.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  6. 6. doggus 10:00 PM 12/30/09

    Geothermal. The only way to go! Constant, no doubt about baseload. Non polluting - no gas, solid or radioactive storage problems. No energy storage problem. No possible nuclear accident worry. Only problem is location and energy transport - both only transit loss - so what?

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.
Advertisement

Email this Article

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X