• Share
  • Email
  •  1 of 7  
1:00
thumb: 1:00
1:00

Tucked inside an entry capsule, the rover first separates from its interplanetary propulsion and power systems.

[Link to this slide]
Don Foley
2:00
thumb: 2:00

2:00

The capsule ejects ballast (blocks of tungsten) to shift its center of mass and turn it into a wing that can be piloted. It encounters the upper Martian atmosphere at a hypersonic velocity of approximately six kilometers per second....[More]

3:00
thumb: 3:00
3:00

The craft then flies horizontally, burning off speed, as side rocket thrusters steer it toward its landing site.

[Link to this slide]
Don Foley
4:00
thumb: 4:00
4:00

At an altitude of 10 kilometers, the spacecraft deploys a parachute that is 50 meters long and 21.5 meters in diameter.

[Link to this slide]
Don Foley
5:00
thumb: 5:00

5:00

By this point, the rover is still supersonic. Designing the chute has been an especially challenging part of the mission. The physics of how a parachute inflates (or oscillates, or does not inflate) at these speeds is not well understood and is extremely difficult to model....[More]

6:00
thumb: 6:00

6:00

At approximately 20 meters above the Martian surface, the rover is lowered on three cables, a configuration known as the sky crane, and placed on the surface, with its wheels and suspension fully deployed....[More]

7:00
thumb: 7:00

7:00

It waits two seconds to confirm that it is on solid ground and fires several pyros (small explosive devices) to cut the cables and a data umbilical cord....[More]

risk free title graphic

YES! Send me a free issue of Scientific American with no obligation to continue the subscription. If I like it, I will be billed for the one-year subscription.

cover image
ADVERTISEMENT

3 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. eddiequest 09:33 AM 7/8/12

    In my view, this beast will not land very well. The UNnecessary complexity of the landing sequence design will make for total failure; a pile of metal, plastic, and radioactivity.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. jennielb4647 02:26 PM 7/8/12

    Why expect failure. Why would complexity of the landing sequence necessarily lead to failure? We have already had success w/moon landing and other space feats. I for one hope it's successful...

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. gstowe 10:48 AM 7/9/12

    Unnecessary complexity? Yes, I'm sure they added all that complexity because they thought it would be cool.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.
Advertisement

Email this Article

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X