Slide Shows | Energy & Sustainability

11 Surprising Natural Lessons from Mount St. Helens

What have scientists learned from 30 years of research and rebirth in the blast zone?

  • Share
  • Email
  •  1 of 11  
SHADES OF GRAY:
thumb: SHADES OF GRAY:

SHADES OF GRAY:

After Mount St. Helens's peak broke off into the largest terrestrial landslide in recorded history, 540 million tons of ash began shooting up into the air--reaching as high as 15 miles above Earth....[More]

AIRBORNE ASH:
thumb: AIRBORNE ASH:

AIRBORNE ASH:

Despite the mess, the situation in the skies could have been far worse, notes William Scott, a geologist with the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). ...[More]

SURVIVAL OF THE DEEPEST:
thumb: SURVIVAL OF THE DEEPEST:

SURVIVAL OF THE DEEPEST:

While most of the life above ground perished in the eruption, some organisms that were protected underground, underwater or in snowbanks endured....[More]

LOST AND FOUND:
thumb: LOST AND FOUND:

LOST AND FOUND:

Animals that relied on Mount St. Helens's former stands of old-growth forests, such as the northern spotted owl, may not be returning to the volcanic region for a while....[More]

LEAPING LUPINE:
thumb: LEAPING LUPINE:

LEAPING LUPINE:

One particular species of plant quickly became the building block for much of the renewed flora and fauna around Mount St. Helens. On a stretch of the volcano known as Pumice Plain, where life essentially had to start from scratch, tens of millions of lupines pushed their way up through the ash....[More]

LIFE IN TRANSITION:
thumb: LIFE IN TRANSITION:

LIFE IN TRANSITION:

A forest may not be nearly as bleak as it looks following a major eruption, windstorm, insect infestation or fire. In fact, researchers now think that the resulting ecosystem often becomes highly productive, bustling with survivors, opportunists and habitat specialists....[More]

RAINING SPIDERS:
thumb: RAINING SPIDERS:

RAINING SPIDERS:

In the first several years after the eruption, more than 120 species of spiders, including this one, Lepthyphantes tenuis , rained out of the sky and onto the devastated Pumice Plain....[More]

'SMART SPIDERS':
thumb: 'SMART SPIDERS':

'SMART SPIDERS':

Before 1980, one lone seismometer rested on Mount St. Helens. "We've gotten much smarter since," says Scott of the USGS. Today, scientists have an array of constantly improving technologies that should help them better forecast future eruptions....[More]

THE HEAT IS ON:
thumb: THE HEAT IS ON:

THE HEAT IS ON:

Thermal cameras were essential in tracking the reawakening of Mount St. Helens between 2004 and 2008. The devices can detect the growth of lava domes, as well as the development of cracks in places where the dome might be breaking apart....[More]

TROUBLED TOUTLE:
thumb: TROUBLED TOUTLE:

TROUBLED TOUTLE:

On May 18, 1980, the former peak of Mount St. Helens buried the neighboring Toutle River Valley in hundreds of feet of debris. Three decades later, trouble continues to run through the valley....[More]

LARGER LESSONS:
thumb: LARGER LESSONS:

LARGER LESSONS:

"Whenever there is a big catastrophe, such as a forest fire, society's impulse is to do two things: salvage any remaining economic value--much of the wood is often still good--and help it on its way to recovery by replanting," says Bishop....[More]

risk free title graphic

YES! Send me a free issue of Scientific American with no obligation to continue the subscription. If I like it, I will be billed for the one-year subscription.

cover image
ADVERTISEMENT

10 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. frgough 05:26 PM 5/19/10

    So, when a volcano devastates a vast area of wilderness, it's a good thing because it opens the door for disadvantaged species. But when a man-made disaster has the potential of devastating a large area of wilderness, it's the apocalypse.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. dbtinc in reply to frgough 05:37 PM 5/19/10

    frgough - interesting thought and one that is consistent with the idea that man's "interference" with nature is "unnatural" when in reality it's perfectly natural. We may not like the outcome but ...

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. jmpeavler 06:06 PM 5/19/10

    This seems to be a lesson in what probably happens after each major extinction event, such as the catastrophe at the end f the Cretaceous. Only they often take a few thousand years, presumably.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  4. 4. quincykim 07:39 PM 5/19/10

    frgough - I agree, humans are part of the big picture, and that includes human-induced disasters. I do believe that we have the responsibility to avoid disasters if possible and mitigate damage when disasters occur. However, our concept of "restoring" is just that: our concept. Well-meaning, but perhaps as misguided as our disasters. Maybe that's part of the big picture too--creating disasters and mucking the recovery. As dbtinc says, it's interesting.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  5. 5. vendicar9 10:48 PM 5/19/10

    So, when a person dies naturally, that is life, but when a person is mudered by another this is suddenly murder and considered a bad thing.

    Moral individuals and competent thinkers undertand why this is so, moral and intellectual degenerates do not.



    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  6. 6. soundaround 10:15 AM 5/20/10

    This is, once again, SA's narrow perspective on another subject. When I visited the blast zone about two year's after the event with Weyerhaeuser forester's they indeed reported and displayed that after they salvaged 600 truck loads a day for a year of downed logs that species and biodiversity increased exponentially. Right next to their land the forest land managed (or should I say mangled) by the Federal Govt. had not been touched and the forest floor was still essentially dead for miles around covered in rotting logs and ash. Thus, one has to wonder who the "forest managers" SA talked to in this article. Maybe the ones who have an agenda to prohibit proper forest management that includes utilizing our only sustainably renewable natural resource?

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  7. 7. craiger77 in reply to soundaround 12:02 PM 5/20/10

    The ideas expressed here come after 30 years, not 2. What happens in the short term is usually not indicative what you will see in the long term. One of the main arguments 30 years ago for preserving large areas of the blast zone is so we have had those areas to compare to the places we allowed salvage logging to take place.

    What you want to refer to as "The Federal Government" was actually a large body of scientists who where experts in their field who recommended what happened in the blast zone at the time. As this article points out, many of their recommendations where based on erroneous assumptions of what would happen over the years, but only by preserving undisturbed areas have we found that out.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  8. 8. treyle 12:08 PM 5/20/10

    I lived in Pt. Townsend, Washington when Mt. St. Helens went off. My family was getting ready for church. We were about 300 miles away, but it sounded like the shipyard at Bremerton had exploded. It shook our house with 3 large "booms." The ash went East, but we got enough that I collected a jar full. My horses were covered in it and the hay we got from Eastern Washington was full of it and no one knew what it would do to animals or humans. It was a scary time. There was so much energy from the blast, it caused electrical storms and the sky was pitch black. I flew over the Mountain 2 years ago and was amazed at it's recovery and how big the trees were. It was a time that I will never forget. People were fighting the police to get to their cabins, days before it went off. The ones that died were the ones that got thru the barricades because the police tried to keep them out. There were warnings that it was going to blow, but no one expected to see what happened in the end. I will always wonder what would have happened if they would have just left it as it was. I will wonder if nature would have repaired itself without the replantings or cleanup. It was an awesome natural disaster that took your breath away at it's power. I will always remember Harry Truman and Spirit Lake and his wish to stay there where his wife was buried. My first thoughts were of him. It changed the landscape and people's lives. The ecological system was changed forever, but we have to remember that it was something that has gone on forever. Nature doesn't have to ask to happen.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  9. 9. gimmepassport 04:40 PM 5/20/10

    This is nothing new. The native Indians burned large tracts of forest because they understood the ecological gains far outweighed any damage. Today, We spend $Millions to fight forest fires. What a waste of resources (Not natural, but budgetary)!!

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  10. 10. Quinn the Eskimo 05:04 PM 5/20/10

    #12

    BP can't shut one down. Ooooooooo.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.
Advertisement

Email this Article

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X