Slide Shows | Space

Space Aged: 10 Spacecraft from Decades Past That Are Still Ticking [Slide Show]

Whether peering into deep space or checking on human activity, spacecraft and satellites from days gone by are still on the job

  • Share
  • Email
  •  1 of 10  
GOES 3 (1978):
thumb: GOES 3 (1978):

GOES 3 (1978):

Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite 3 (GOES 3) was the third in a series of National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) weather satellites designed to maintain a fixed position relative to Earth....[More]

TDRS 1 (1983):
thumb: TDRS 1 (1983):

TDRS 1 (1983):

The first of NASA's Tracking and Data Relay Satellites (TDRS) was released from space shuttle Challenger in 1983—its deployment is shown in the photograph above....[More]

AMSAT-OSCAR 7 (1974):
thumb: AMSAT-OSCAR 7 (1974):

AMSAT-OSCAR 7 (1974):

A satellite launched for amateur radio communications in 1974, AMSAT–OSCAR 7 (AO 7) fell dormant in 1981 when a battery failed. In 2002, however, a ham radio user picked up a signal from the aging orbiter's beacon....[More]

VOYAGERS 1 AND 2 (1977):
thumb: VOYAGERS 1 AND 2 (1977):

VOYAGERS 1 AND 2 (1977):

Voyager 1, having journeyed for more than 30 years, is now the farthest man-made object in the universe at more than 10 billion miles from the sun....[More]

PIONEER 6 (1965):
thumb: PIONEER 6 (1965):

PIONEER 6 (1965):

The solar-orbiting Pioneer spacecraft numbered 6 through 9 were early explorers of interplanetary phenomena such as cosmic rays and the newly confirmed solar wind....[More]

GOES 7 (1987):
thumb: GOES 7 (1987):

GOES 7 (1987):

Another member of the Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite family, GOES 7 was launched in 1987 and served its purpose as a meteorological observer for a dozen years....[More]

ISEE 3/ICE (1978):
thumb: ISEE 3/ICE (1978):

ISEE 3/ICE (1978):

The third spacecraft of the International Sun–Earth Explorer (ISEE) program began its work in an orbit between the sun and Earth. From its position there, ISEE 3 monitored cosmic gamma-ray bursts and solar flares before being rechristened the International Cometary Explorer (ICE) in 1982....[More]

LANDSAT 5 (1984):
thumb: LANDSAT 5 (1984):

LANDSAT 5 (1984):

The U.S. Geological Survey's Earth-observing Landsat 5 has captured hundreds of thousands of photographs of our changing planet in its 25 years on orbit....[More]

HUBBLE SPACE TELESCOPE (1990):
thumb: HUBBLE SPACE TELESCOPE (1990):

HUBBLE SPACE TELESCOPE (1990):

Thanks to a series of complex servicing missions by space shuttle astronauts, the Hubble Space Telescope, deployed one shuttle flight prior to the now-defunct Ulysses, is still going strong 19 years into its operational life....[More]

LAGEOS 1 (1976):
thumb: LAGEOS 1 (1976):

LAGEOS 1 (1976):

The LAGEOS 1 (Laser Geodynamics Satellite) and its younger counterpart LAGEOS 2, launched in 1992, are passive satellites, meaning there is precious little to break or go wrong....[More]

risk free title graphic

YES! Send me a free issue of Scientific American with no obligation to continue the subscription. If I like it, I will be billed for the one-year subscription.

cover image
ADVERTISEMENT

16 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. Livestrong 08:08 AM 7/29/09

    John, Excellent Summary, thank you for your research. As an Amateur Radio Operator, every time I make a contact with another operator using AO-7 , the "Grand Old Lady", I'm aware of this "bird" that rises again, thank you. pete WB2OQQ

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. rwilliston 09:30 AM 7/29/09

    What, no mention of the Iridium satellites? I'm disappointed. I know they were launched beginning in 1997 but they are an array of over 70 satellites that have outlived their designed life yet are still in use. For the complexity of such an array I'd say they deserve some mention.
    I'm only peeved because I specified the coatings on the antennae for these satellites and aside from running into the occasional Russian satellite, they have performed remarkably well.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. cpeggers 11:03 PM 7/29/09

    there's a guy in australia called dr karl who's worth following

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  4. 4. Merrily1941 11:05 PM 7/29/09

    Yay for Voyagers 1 and 2! These are the little spacecraft that could and did and are still doing. I am SO proud!

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  5. 5. Joey in reply to Merrily1941 12:22 AM 7/30/09

    Agree with you.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  6. 6. Joey 12:26 AM 7/30/09

    Thank you!

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  7. 7. Noval53 04:49 AM 7/30/09

    LANDSAT5 (1984-20__). Designed for 3 years service; what a bargain.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  8. 8. Weltschmertz 05:41 PM 7/30/09

    Just an idle thought:
    If we know the positions of the voyagers, wouldn't they provide the longest parallax ranging baseline we've ever possessed?
    Since our range data is largely hiearchal based on measured distances to known Cepheids, couldn't a few plates from the voyagers improve the accuracy of our whole scale of astronomical ranges?

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  9. 9. FeverDog in reply to Europamoon100 12:19 PM 7/31/09

    I read D.A.W.'s comments and hear them in my head in the voice of the character "Comic Book Guy" from the Simpsons cartoon.

    Pedantic, arrogant, ...lonely.

    His antennae twitch as he peruses the World Wide Web tasked with purging archaic word-usage and correcting grammatical minutiae.

    Perhaps he could be repurposed for work on a reality television series where he would be locked in a cage of screaming macaques while bragging about his impressive academic pedigree.

    E.D.U.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  10. 10. FeverDog in reply to Europamoon100 12:20 PM 7/31/09

    I read D.A.W.'s comments and hear them in my head in the voice of the character "Comic Book Guy" from the Simpsons cartoon.

    Pedantic, arrogant, ...lonely.

    His antennae twitch as he peruses the World Wide Web tasked with purging archaic word-usage and correcting grammatical minutiae.

    Perhaps he could be repurposed for work on a reality television series where he would be locked in a cage of screaming macaques while bragging about his impressive academic pedigree.

    E.D.U.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  11. 11. rockjohny 02:16 PM 8/4/09

    hey Europamoon100, is Anal Retentive also a 'jargon phrase'?

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  12. 12. tonytieger 07:31 AM 8/5/09

    Well, at least we know what will happen to Voyager in the future. Wierd that it would want a human to "mate" with.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  13. 13. charrisgw in reply to FeverDog 12:22 PM 8/5/09

    Nicely done ... good for a chuckle

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  14. 14. mjc in reply to Europamoon100 08:54 PM 8/6/09

    Why is it always "egghead" types that ALWAYS respond in a condensending manner and then ALWAYS include their "accomplishments" so as to legitimize their comments? Souldns like a liberal, democrat elitest to me...!

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  15. 15. candide in reply to Joey 09:42 AM 9/7/09

    Why do you write a comment that adds nothing and shows the world your poor grammar and syntax?

    Add name calling on top and you are obviously a class(less) act.

    We do not just "need the informations" - the way it is presented also matters. Please go back to school, as many contributors at SciAm should also.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  16. 16. eddierleram 10:24 AM 12/7/09

    The last photo, "Family Portrait" and the pale blue dot in the ray of sunlight: The ray, according to the location from the camera's position when the image was taken, has to be like a wave from the Sun. That means as there are three rays seen, there must be more rays all the way back to the ball of fire from which the rays originated. The rays would also extend out to the equatorial area of the heliosphere, and be striking that area exactly where the bright circle has been quite recently discovered.
    How could they have the energy to excite the heliosphere's equatorial area's captured positive energied proton gas from the solar wind's 80% content?
    That would be as the circles of sunlight are not circles, but are electromagnetic field lines (EM-FL), of which there are 16. Each of those EM-FL is an induced energy from the upper surface of each of the equatorial dynamos in the convection zone. Those 16 dynamos had been called - internal weather big fronts at the equator, while investigators call them equatorial big cells. - Sacha Brun, of France, as reported in arxiv.org, had been looking at small upper latitude tapered cells, which are merely a portion of one north and to the left EM-FL from its dynamo to the polar circle as it lines up for its exit to the corona as a loop to return to the opposed face of the dynamo.
    So, those waves of sunlight are spiraled EM-FL whose energy comes from the 16 dynamos, and which receive an induced current through the tachocline and from each of the sixteen magnetic toroids in the radiative zone where at each fusion reaction takes place.
    The reason for there not being much visibility to the EM-FL is because being an induced energy from a rotating disk of a grouping of electrons, in a dynamo, and as the 4 groupings in each dynamo rotate so that their each opposed pair of EM-FL contact the induction systems unattached conductor to the heliosphere on an on/off situation and are therefore an AC current, which does not exhibit as large a magnetic surround as does a DC conductor.
    The electrics of that situation are listed in any EM instruction manual as the induction principle. That fact of the dynamo is listed under the properties of ionized plasma. The spiraled arms from each dynamo are listed as galaxy-like arms in a small novel: ISBN 978-0-9784457-1-3.
    There is another energy from the toroids fusion reaction zones, which is the reason that the induced energy spiraled solar plane arms arc at the heliosphere's equatorial area, but that clarity takes more room than is available in this little comment section.
    The Ancient One: Eddie R.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.
Advertisement

Email this Article

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X