Slide Shows | More Science

Slide Show: The Science Behind 10 Natural Skin Remedies: Why They Work--Or Don't

From hydrating to getting a good night's sleep, two dermatologists explain which home treatments actually work--and why

  • Share
  • Email
  •  1 of 10  
ATHLETE'S FACE: Exercise might be good for the inside of the body, but does it help the outside, too
thumb: ATHLETE'S FACE: Exercise might be good for the inside of the body, but does it help the outside, too

ATHLETE'S FACE: Exercise might be good for the inside of the body, but does it help the outside, too

A brisk workout may leave exercisers feeling good (thanks to those happy-making neurochemicals, endorphins), but can a single exercise session leave you looking better, too?...[More]

NO BUTTS ABOUT IT: What does smoking really do to your skin?
thumb: NO BUTTS ABOUT IT: What does smoking really do to your skin?

NO BUTTS ABOUT IT: What does smoking really do to your skin?

It's common knowledge that smoking isn't good for skin, but what exactly makes it so bad? Among the many downsides, Madfes says: "You have increased free radicals from nicotine; you have decreased oxygen in the skin; repetitive motion [of smoking causes] wrinkle lines in lips." Free radicals, highly reactive chemical particles that can cause cell damage, increase the body's production of metalloproteinase, enzymes that break down collagen....[More]

YOU ARE WHAT YOU EAT: Can you eat your way to better skin?
thumb: YOU ARE WHAT YOU EAT: Can you eat your way to better skin?

YOU ARE WHAT YOU EAT: Can you eat your way to better skin?

Sugar isn't looking so sweet to many dermatologists these days. It's already gotten a bad rap for a host of other health issues, and now it's also a beauty no-no....[More]

WATER IS THE FOUNTAIN OF YOUTH: Is super-hydration just hype?
thumb: WATER IS THE FOUNTAIN OF YOUTH: Is super-hydration just hype?

WATER IS THE FOUNTAIN OF YOUTH: Is super-hydration just hype?

Eight glasses of water a day has long been the gold standard for general health. But as metal water canteens have taken on the status of fashion accessory alongside canvas tote bags, are hyper-hydrators doing their skin a huge favor?...[More]

OIL IT UP: Is oil better slathered or swallowed?
thumb: OIL IT UP: Is oil better slathered or swallowed?

OIL IT UP: Is oil better slathered or swallowed?

For dry skin, some advocate putting oils on the body, whereas others believe it's best to up oil intake through supplements or diet. The answer: do both....[More]

SUPPLING SUPPLEMENTS: Do vitamins or herbal supplements make for more supple skin?
thumb: SUPPLING SUPPLEMENTS: Do vitamins or herbal supplements make for more supple skin?

SUPPLING SUPPLEMENTS: Do vitamins or herbal supplements make for more supple skin?

Skepticism about the efficacy of supplements has been mounting among scientists. But dermatologists say some of them may help stave off skin damage....[More]

BEAUTY AND THE FEAST: Will fruit facemasks keep the dermatologist away?
thumb: BEAUTY AND THE FEAST: Will fruit facemasks keep the dermatologist away?

BEAUTY AND THE FEAST: Will fruit facemasks keep the dermatologist away?

It might sound appealing to shun pricey facial treatments in favor of a homemade concoction of fresh fruit and other inexpensive edible ingredients....[More]

TEABAGS AND CUCUMBERS: Good for more than a tea party and finger sandwiches?
thumb: TEABAGS AND CUCUMBERS: Good for more than a tea party and finger sandwiches?

TEABAGS AND CUCUMBERS: Good for more than a tea party and finger sandwiches?

Cucumber slices are practically the universal sign for home skin care, but can this little trick from the past really perk up tired-looking eyes?...[More]

SCRUB-A-DUB: Are homemade exfoliants the better bet?
thumb: SCRUB-A-DUB: Are homemade exfoliants the better bet?

SCRUB-A-DUB: Are homemade exfoliants the better bet?

Giving the old bod a good scrub down can get rid of dull, dead skin cells . But are all exfoliation treatments created equal? Madfes says there's no reason to spring for an expensive scrub, noting that any granular paste—including homemade varieties—can get rid of dead skin simply by virtue of its mechanical abrasiveness....[More]

BEAUTY REST: Does a well-rested body equal a fresher face?
thumb: BEAUTY REST: Does a well-rested body equal a fresher face?

BEAUTY REST: Does a well-rested body equal a fresher face?

Clichés often turn out to be true, but surely the validity of beauty rest as a treatment was banished along with corsets and pin curls.

"Actually, it does make a difference," Madfes says....[More]

risk free title graphic

YES! Send me a free issue of Scientific American with no obligation to continue the subscription. If I like it, I will be billed for the one-year subscription.

cover image
ADVERTISEMENT

6 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. trim_one 12:52 PM 5/7/09

    Never thought of smoking as a remedy . . .

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. Aplastic in reply to trim_one 02:51 AM 5/9/09

    Lol...I was thinking the same thing.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. santarosa 04:16 PM 5/12/09

    "Scientific" American !!!!

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  4. 4. rockjohny 01:38 PM 5/13/09

    smoking is a remedy if you want to get rid of young looking skin

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  5. 5. ihk888 07:40 AM 5/15/09

    are any of these based on real scientific evidence or guess work? obviously it is very popular to use terms such as antioxidant, free radical etc but does anybody know what these are doing to skin, body or mind.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  6. 6. SexyRationalist 02:13 PM 1/15/13

    I'm disappointed that something titled 'The Science Behind Skin Remedies..." would contain such little actual science. A few of the remedies that were said to work do so because they contain 'anti-oxidants', which are supposedly act as 'free-radical scavengers' that work to repair and rejuvenate skin.

    The fact is antioxidants have yet to be successfully linked with aging.
    The theory that aging is caused by "oxidative stress", the action of reactive oxygen types, such as superoxide, has dominated the field of aging research for over fifty years. Numerous studies have failed, however, to find any empirical evidence in support of this. Despite this fact the free-radical theory still dominates the field of aging- not to mention the fact that so many products, treatments, and diets are focused on this malarkey.

    Seems to me that since you bothered to go and interview these people that claim such things, you could have at least asked them about the lack of credibility behind the theory. That's not only good reporting, it's also good science.

    Finally, if you would have bothered to even do a lit search - how about on the very site your writing this article on - Scientific American - you may have come across some of these article explaining why there is no science behind antioxidants and aging. I provided some links below to help you get started!

    http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=antioxidants

    http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=the-truth-about-human-agi

    http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=mouse-research-bolsters-c

    http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=no-truth-to-the-fountain-of-youth&page=3


    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.
Advertisement

Email this Article

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X