Slide Shows | More Science

Science, Stimulated: 7 Stimulus-Funded Research Projects [Slide Show]

From building robotic bees to studying real mosquitoes, these researchers were able to pursue their scientific dreams thanks to being banked by 2009 economic recovery act funding

  • Share
  • Email
  •  2 of 7  
DEMYSTIFYING MALARIA IN A CHANGING ENVIRONMENT
thumb: DEMYSTIFYING MALARIA IN A CHANGING ENVIRONMENT

DEMYSTIFYING MALARIA IN A CHANGING ENVIRONMENT

Cumbersome climate change models often produce chunky intel about averages and means, which can help scientists get a handle on trends over time....[More]

USING LASERS TO SEE THE FOREST--AND THE TREES
thumb: USING LASERS TO SEE THE FOREST--AND THE TREES

USING LASERS TO SEE THE FOREST--AND THE TREES

Lasers can be used for all sorts of scientific pursuits, from blasting cancers to playing with plasma physics. But one team of stimulus-backed researchers, led by Qinghua Guo , an assistant professor of engineering at the University of California, Merced, is putting them to work to measure Earth's surface dynamics ....[More]

BUZZING ROBOTIC BEEHIVES
thumb: BUZZING ROBOTIC BEEHIVES

BUZZING ROBOTIC BEEHIVES

Busier than robotic dogs, or even so-called robotic vacuums, a colony of robotic bees is being built at Harvard University thanks to a $9.3-million grant from the stimulus bill....[More]

DIGGING UP HUMANS' RESPONSE TO CLIMATE
thumb: DIGGING UP HUMANS' RESPONSE TO CLIMATE

DIGGING UP HUMANS' RESPONSE TO CLIMATE

With forecasts of sea-level rises and changing weather patterns, people today have been forewarned about some likely ramifications of climate change ....[More]

HOMING IN ON HORMONE REGULATION
thumb: HOMING IN ON HORMONE REGULATION

HOMING IN ON HORMONE REGULATION

"A lot is known about estrogen," says Melinda Wilson , an associate professor in the Department of Physiology at the University of Kentucky in Lexington, but "not nearly as much is known about how [it] is regulated."

She and her team are using a three-year, $591,929 NSF award to develop animal models that will help explain how estrogen receptors work in the brain over a complete life span....[More]

GOING VIRAL
thumb: GOING VIRAL

GOING VIRAL

If you were an unknown species of virus , where would you hide? That is the question Mark Young , a professor of molecular biosciences at Montana State University in Bozeman, has been occupying himself with lately....[More]

STIMULATING STUDY OF THE STIMULUS
thumb: STIMULATING STUDY OF THE STIMULUS

STIMULATING STUDY OF THE STIMULUS

One researcher figured that some of the Recovery Act money should go studying the impact of the influx itself. Amy Pienta , an associate research scientist at the University of Michigan at Ann Arbor, is heading up an NSF-funded project to evaluate the ramifications of the stimulus on social science research....[More]

risk free title graphic

YES! Send me a free issue of Scientific American with no obligation to continue the subscription. If I like it, I will be billed for the one-year subscription.

cover image
ADVERTISEMENT

11 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. Soccerdad 08:58 AM 2/18/10

    Robotic bees? Studying the effect of stimulus spending for research on boosting research?

    No offense to Joe Biden, but I believe taxpayers could have utilized the money more wisely for themselves.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. Spoonman in reply to Soccerdad 10:00 AM 2/18/10

    Yes, they would've either spent it on useless crap they'd be throwing away in two months, or sticking into a savings account to further stimulate Wall Street. There is no such thing as useless scientific research.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. dskan 11:28 AM 2/18/10

    If you think $10 million is too much on those robotic bees, clearly you've never heard how much DARPA and the Navy have invested in microrobotics.

    Incidentally, you might think differently in 15 years, when microrobots are routinely scouring earthquake rubble for victims, searching buildings for hostages, scouting terrain for IEDs...

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  4. 4. Spoonman in reply to dskan 11:49 AM 2/18/10

    Silly, dskan, Soccerdad has never been interested in facts or practical applications.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  5. 5. Soccerdad 02:54 PM 2/18/10

    So, the argument is that taxpayers are not entitled to keep their own money because they will waste it on "useless crap" or "sticking it into a savings account". Interesting position. Also interesting is the statement that there is no such thing as useless scientific research.

    Here's a topic for study. Why do socialists believe they are more suited to spending a taxpayer's money than the taxpayer themselves?

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  6. 6. anencephalic 08:25 PM 2/18/10

    What a load. 1.8 mil studying the impact of global warming on the transmission of infectious diseases. No rise for the last 15 years. No proof of any unnatural warming. Now that we're gonna be tied to earth, me and Stephen Hawking are pissed.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  7. 7. robert schmidt in reply to Soccerdad 07:35 PM 2/20/10

    @Soccerdad, one of the errors in your rant is that the money belongs to the taxpayer and therefore the government is unjustly taking it from them. It takes a great deal of ignorance and arrogance to think that the money you earn was as a result of your efforts and your efforts alone. Society has protected you with a criminal justice system and emergency services, has protected your interests outside of the country with diplomatic, intelligence and military services, has enabled you to work by providing you and your employer with infrastructure and the list goes on. The technologies industries commercialize often have their origins in publicly funded science or military research projects. Furthermore, the whole concept of money is an artificial construct that is created and supported by the state. It is the government's job to determine how the public's money is best spent. Sometimes the government will spend a buck to generate 2 bucks worth of jobs and security for you and your family. Therefore you owe your fellow Americans your share of those expenses. The fact that you do not appreciate the complexities of economics underscores why no one asked you to make those decisions.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  8. 8. seymour_infenergy 08:58 AM 2/22/10

    MY THEORY is the bees wing is obsorbing friction from the top of the wing then emitting the friction on bottom of the wing, causing the bee to create a anti-gravity situation or take the path of least resistance. So they are falling up. Yes I am the best at what I do.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  9. 9. Soccerdad 09:41 AM 2/22/10

    Robert,

    Is your real last name Gibbs?

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  10. 10. IMA11389 05:48 PM 2/23/10

    Nice to see all of our tax dollars are going to good use. Do they really think they'll learn how to manage emergency medical response and traffic through a hive of robotic bee's?

    Granted, I find it interesting and there could be some potential scientific benefits. But can we really afford to be spending 10 million dollars on a hive of robotic bee's? These are the types of projects/decisions that lead to the problems we're trying to fix in our economy

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  11. 11. IMA11389 in reply to Soccerdad 05:52 PM 2/23/10

    good question. I'll put down another 10 million for the answer to that one. ;)

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.
Advertisement

Email this Article

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X