



From building robotic bees to studying real mosquitoes, these researchers were able to pursue their scientific dreams thanks to being banked by 2009 economic recovery act funding
By Katherine Harmon | February 17, 2010 | 11
Cumbersome climate change models often produce chunky intel about averages and means, which can help scientists get a handle on trends over time....[More]
Cumbersome climate change models often produce chunky intel about averages and means, which can help scientists get a handle on trends over time. But when trying to plan for specific animal or pathogen behavior in the short-term, some researchers require more detailed data.
Matthew Thomas, a professor at the Center for Infectious Disease Dynamics and the Department of Entomology at The Pennsylvania State University, is studying the impact of climate change on malaria and dengue fever transmission. "Mosquitoes don't experience mean monthly temperatures," he says. "They're experiencing what's happening now."
One of the earliest ARRA-funded projects to start, having kicked off in June 2009, Thomas's project will help to resolve some of this lack of resolution, drilling down to hourly temperature predictions in specific locations. He and his lab aim to marry that information with new findings about mosquito and malaria biology. Real-time temperatures affect everything from mosquito metabolism (which influences how often they are inclined to bite us for a blood meal) to the growth rate of the malaria parasite, "but they do so in a very nonlinear way," Thomas says. "So, small changes in temperature can have a very big impact on biology and physiology."
[Less]
[Link to this slide]
Lasers can be used for all sorts of scientific pursuits, from blasting cancers to playing with plasma physics. But one team of stimulus-backed researchers, led by Qinghua Guo , an assistant professor of engineering at the University of California, Merced, is putting them to work to measure Earth's surface dynamics ....[More]
Lasers can be used for all sorts of scientific pursuits, from blasting cancers to playing with plasma physics. But one team of stimulus-backed researchers, led by Qinghua Guo, an assistant professor of engineering at the University of California, Merced, is putting them to work to measure Earth's surface dynamics.
By doing a series of flyovers on specially equipped planes, Guo's team can obtain three-dimensional maps of forests, hills, snow and rivers. Lasers pulse downward at a high frequency and carefully calibrated equipment measures the reflected beams to produce a "very high precision" image, Guo says. The resulting maps are so hyperdetailed, he notes, that "you can look at individual trees."
The data-rich maps can help hydrologists, geomorphologists and others to better understand the physical dynamics in their fields. Nuances of erosion, vegetation change and stream bank movement are often missed in course measurements of other aerial mapping (such as the standard used by the U.S. Geological Survey, which has a resolution of about 30 meters, Guo notes). But the information will not just be squirreled away for specialists. "We're going to make the data available to the broader Earth science community as well as to the public," Guo says. The NSF grant of $935,457 was awarded last September and the team—with assistance from the NSF's National Center for Airborne Laser Mapping—is preparing to make their first flights next month.
[Less]
[Link to this slide]
Busier than robotic dogs, or even so-called robotic vacuums, a colony of robotic bees is being built at Harvard University thanks to a $9.3-million grant from the stimulus bill....[More]
Busier than robotic dogs, or even so-called robotic vacuums, a colony of robotic bees is being built at Harvard University thanks to a $9.3-million grant from the stimulus bill. The goal? No honey-making here, but the results might be even sweeter—scientifically speaking. The team, led by Robert Wood, an assistant professor of electrical engineering at Harvard's Microrobotics Laboratory, aims to create "a colony of autonomous, microscale flapping-wing robots," the researchers explained in an e-mail.
Their self-proclaimed "lofty goal" involves engineering and computing problems from flight dynamics to electronic brains and social interactions. Although their materials and techniques are decidedly man-made, "nature is our inspiration," they noted.
In the long run, the researchers hope that the project will create more than just a hive of "robobees" as they are known. They propose that the problems that they will have to solve along the way will add insight to everything from search-and-rescue missions to traffic monitoring.
The project will continue buzzing along until mid-2014, and the research is already being taken into local high school classrooms to "inspire students to go into engineering and computer science."
[Less]
[Link to this slide]
With forecasts of sea-level rises and changing weather patterns, people today have been forewarned about some likely ramifications of climate change ....[More]
With forecasts of sea-level rises and changing weather patterns, people today have been forewarned about some likely ramifications of climate change. But those living thousands of years ago, during the Holocene climatic optimum, could not have known what lay ahead of them and how their land—and lives—would be changing.
Ezra Zubrow, a professor in the Department of Anthropology at the State University of New York at Buffalo, and an international team of researchers are trying to paint a picture of how these ancient humans coped with changing climes and what impact the shifts had on their cultures. With the help of $845,796 in stimulus award money from the NSF, he has enlisted the help of geologists, geochemists, paleoecologists, anthropologists and others to study the environmental, geographic and social changes of the past (through core samples and ancient settlements in Kamchatka in Russia's far east)—in hopes of better preparing for ones in the future. As Zubrow points out, despite more sophisticated prediction and technology overall, many of the world's people have residences and lifestyles that are similarly vulnerable to climactic shifts.
For those who question spending U.S. stimulus money abroad, Zubrow reiterates a point he often tells his students: Such research is "good for science, good for the economy, good for the government—and good for the international reputation of the United States."
[Less]
[Link to this slide]
"A lot is known about estrogen," says Melinda Wilson , an associate professor in the Department of Physiology at the University of Kentucky in Lexington, but "not nearly as much is known about how [it] is regulated."
She and her team are using a three-year, $591,929 NSF award to develop animal models that will help explain how estrogen receptors work in the brain over a complete life span....[More]
"A lot is known about estrogen," says Melinda Wilson, an associate professor in the Department of Physiology at the University of Kentucky in Lexington, but "not nearly as much is known about how [it] is regulated."
She and her team are using a three-year, $591,929 NSF award to develop animal models that will help explain how estrogen receptors work in the brain over a complete life span. "These mechanisms have been known for quite awhile to regulate breast cancer," she notes, but "people hadn't looked [at them] in the brain." The team joins researchers from the established field of endocrinology with those in the growing field of epigenetics.
"We might be able to apply that into an adult brain in the case of aging or neurodegeneration," she says. The team already published a study on some of their early findings this year in the journal Endrocrinology. Much of their award has gone to supporting graduate and undergraduate students who work in the lab.
[Less]
[Link to this slide]
If you were an unknown species of virus , where would you hide? That is the question Mark Young , a professor of molecular biosciences at Montana State University in Bozeman, has been occupying himself with lately....[More]
If you were an unknown species of virus, where would you hide? That is the question Mark Young, a professor of molecular biosciences at Montana State University in Bozeman, has been occupying himself with lately. He is currently stalking new strains in remote hot springs in the Andes.
Although much of the world's megafauna has been classified, most of the smaller life-forms are still living in scientific obscurity. "We are just at the very beginning stages of understanding biodiversity on this planet," Young says. "This is just one little step." "Little" in some respects—the viruses he is currently studying infect archaea, which are single-celled organisms similar to bacteria. But big in others—he and his group have already turned up entirely new families of viruses that are "completely unrelated to previously known viruses."
His $1.3-million ARRA grant will propel his and his team's virus-finding mission well into 2014. "It's very difficult to get finances to do fundamental evolutionary biology," Young says. Without the stimulus, "it would be very difficult to get this magnitude of a project funded."
[Less]
[Link to this slide]
One researcher figured that some of the Recovery Act money should go studying the impact of the influx itself. Amy Pienta , an associate research scientist at the University of Michigan at Ann Arbor, is heading up an NSF-funded project to evaluate the ramifications of the stimulus on social science research....[More]
One researcher figured that some of the Recovery Act money should go studying the impact of the influx itself. Amy Pienta, an associate research scientist at the University of Michigan at Ann Arbor, is heading up an NSF-funded project to evaluate the ramifications of the stimulus on social science research.
Her previous research has focused on what kind of research ends up exerting the biggest influence. And with the one-year award of $199,951, she and her team will start "laying the foundation to survey ARRA funding" to later assess whether the funding infusion helped boost research, and how it might have changed the field. And such data is in high demand: "We are always trying to understand how valuable research data are," she says. New approaches to analysis will attempt to merge quantifiable data based on paper publications, citations and grants with more nuanced information from interviews and less traditional types of communication, such as blogs. "We're developing the initial instrument for social science," Pienta says, but she notes that they hope to be able to expand to assess the impact of stimulus funds on the physical sciences, as well.
[Less]
[Link to this slide]
YES! Send me a free issue of Scientific American with no obligation to continue the subscription. If I like it, I will be billed for the one-year subscription.
Scientists Confirm Great Antiquity of Sophisticated Cave Art
News Scan Briefs
The Reality of Race
Gene Activity, Not Sequence, Makes Us Human
YES! Send me a free issue of Scientific American with no obligation to continue the subscription. If I like it, I will be billed for the one-year subscription.
11 Comments
Add CommentRobotic bees? Studying the effect of stimulus spending for research on boosting research?
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisNo offense to Joe Biden, but I believe taxpayers could have utilized the money more wisely for themselves.
Yes, they would've either spent it on useless crap they'd be throwing away in two months, or sticking into a savings account to further stimulate Wall Street. There is no such thing as useless scientific research.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisIf you think $10 million is too much on those robotic bees, clearly you've never heard how much DARPA and the Navy have invested in microrobotics.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisIncidentally, you might think differently in 15 years, when microrobots are routinely scouring earthquake rubble for victims, searching buildings for hostages, scouting terrain for IEDs...
Silly, dskan, Soccerdad has never been interested in facts or practical applications.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisSo, the argument is that taxpayers are not entitled to keep their own money because they will waste it on "useless crap" or "sticking it into a savings account". Interesting position. Also interesting is the statement that there is no such thing as useless scientific research.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisHere's a topic for study. Why do socialists believe they are more suited to spending a taxpayer's money than the taxpayer themselves?
What a load. 1.8 mil studying the impact of global warming on the transmission of infectious diseases. No rise for the last 15 years. No proof of any unnatural warming. Now that we're gonna be tied to earth, me and Stephen Hawking are pissed.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this@Soccerdad, one of the errors in your rant is that the money belongs to the taxpayer and therefore the government is unjustly taking it from them. It takes a great deal of ignorance and arrogance to think that the money you earn was as a result of your efforts and your efforts alone. Society has protected you with a criminal justice system and emergency services, has protected your interests outside of the country with diplomatic, intelligence and military services, has enabled you to work by providing you and your employer with infrastructure and the list goes on. The technologies industries commercialize often have their origins in publicly funded science or military research projects. Furthermore, the whole concept of money is an artificial construct that is created and supported by the state. It is the government's job to determine how the public's money is best spent. Sometimes the government will spend a buck to generate 2 bucks worth of jobs and security for you and your family. Therefore you owe your fellow Americans your share of those expenses. The fact that you do not appreciate the complexities of economics underscores why no one asked you to make those decisions.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisMY THEORY is the bees wing is obsorbing friction from the top of the wing then emitting the friction on bottom of the wing, causing the bee to create a anti-gravity situation or take the path of least resistance. So they are falling up. Yes I am the best at what I do.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisRobert,
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisIs your real last name Gibbs?
Nice to see all of our tax dollars are going to good use. Do they really think they'll learn how to manage emergency medical response and traffic through a hive of robotic bee's?
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisGranted, I find it interesting and there could be some potential scientific benefits. But can we really afford to be spending 10 million dollars on a hive of robotic bee's? These are the types of projects/decisions that lead to the problems we're trying to fix in our economy
good question. I'll put down another 10 million for the answer to that one. ;)
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this