Slide Shows | More Science

The Top 10 Science Stories of 2010 [Slide Show]

A microbe with an artificial genome, a volcano with an almost unpronounceable name, a disaster that blackened Gulf waters—these and other events defined this year in science and technology

  • Share
  • Email
  •  1 of 10  
10. Neandertal Genome Decoded
thumb: 10. Neandertal Genome Decoded

10. Neandertal Genome Decoded

Long a topic of scandalous speculation, the occasional interbreeding of early humans and Neandertals was backed up by DNA evidence this year with the first major draft of the Neandertal genome ....[More]

9. A Microbe That Lives on Arsenic... Or Does It?
thumb: 9. A Microbe That Lives on Arsenic... Or Does It?

9. A Microbe That Lives on Arsenic... Or Does It?

It all began with a vague but tantalizing press release: NASA issued a statement in late November about a forthcoming press conference "to discuss an astrobiology finding that will impact the search for evidence of extraterrestrial life." Speculation that NASA had found ET ran rampant, but the actual finding turned out to be much more down to Earth....[More]

8. Return of the Electric Car
thumb: 8. Return of the Electric Car

8. Return of the Electric Car

More than a decade after its EV-1 electric car was "killed," General Motors's Chevrolet Volt (pictured) began shipping in December to car dealerships in California, New York State, Texas and Washington, D.C....[More]

7. WikiLeaks
thumb: 7. WikiLeaks

7. WikiLeaks

The U.S. learned a hard lesson in data security on November 28 when WikiLeaks , an organization championing whistle-blowers, began publishing what it claims will amount to more than 250,000 leaked U.S....[More]

6. A New Direction for NASA
thumb: 6. A New Direction for NASA

6. A New Direction for NASA

Since the dawn of the U.S. space program the nation has entrusted NASA, and NASA alone, to build and launch the rockets that carry its astronauts into orbit....[More]

5. Eruption of Eyjafjallajökull
thumb: 5. Eruption of Eyjafjallajökull

5. Eruption of Eyjafjallajökull

On March 20, a volcano in Iceland with an unpronounceable name erupted—and kept erupting over subsequent weeks. All told, Eyjafjallajökull (pronounced "AY-uh-fyat-luh-YOE-kuutl-uh"), whose name means "island mountain glacier" for the ice sheet it melted, injected some 250 million cubic meters of ash into the atmosphere....[More]

4. Synthetic Life
thumb: 4. Synthetic Life

4. Synthetic Life

Will March 26, 2010, go down in history as the dawn of man-made life ? That's the day scientists at the J. Craig Venter Institute inserted an entirely synthesized genome into Mycoplasma capricolum cell and turned it into Mycoplasma mycoides....[More]

3. Major Advances in HIV and AIDS Prevention
thumb: 3. Major Advances in HIV and AIDS Prevention

3. Major Advances in HIV and AIDS Prevention

The encouraging results from the Thai HIV vaccine trial late in 2009 boosted hope that the retrovirus could eventually be beaten . This year witnessed new strides in prevention....[More]

2. The Haiti Earthquake and Cholera Outbreak
thumb: 2. The Haiti Earthquake and Cholera Outbreak

2. The Haiti Earthquake and Cholera Outbreak

January's magnitude 7.0 earthquake created a long tail of death and destruction . Although the images of a wrecked capital city—stemming in large part to a lack of enforceable building codes—were stunning, the damage is still playing out nearly a year later....[More]

1. Gulf of Mexico Oil Spill
thumb: 1. Gulf of Mexico Oil Spill

1. Gulf of Mexico Oil Spill

On April 20, a well-head blowout at BP's Macondo oil well (pictured) set off an explosion on board the Deepwater Horizon rig floating about a mile above....[More]

risk free title graphic

YES! Send me a free issue of Scientific American with no obligation to continue the subscription. If I like it, I will be billed for the one-year subscription.

cover image
ADVERTISEMENT

20 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. Hollycow 09:21 AM 12/23/10

    4 of your top ten have little more than gee wizz value. How does discovery of a new hominid, an atmosphere on another planet, another unremarkable computer or getting a common gas from deep rocks have any real effect on our world.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. BoRon 10:47 AM 12/23/10

    The article does say that these didn't make the top ten. But I agree with what you're saying.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. BoRon in reply to BoRon 10:49 AM 12/23/10

    Oops...that was meant to be a reply to Hollycow

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  4. 4. Eyquem in reply to Hollycow 12:32 PM 12/23/10

    Fracking is used by industry.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  5. 5. mairsh99 01:47 PM 12/23/10

    There can be habitable plants around other stars like we have earth around the sun.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  6. 6. tmusselman26 02:16 PM 12/23/10

    To the comment on Fracking. Fracking has been around for a while, watch Gasland on HBO, I think it was close to making the list because of the controversy surrounding it. It puts toxic chemicals into the environment and wells. It will greatly impact you or anybody you know in the areas where fracking occurs. According to the documentary they were considering Fracking in an area that could contaminate the water supply of New York city and many on the East Cost. It would impact millions, hence why it is on this list.

    Put your narcissism aside and look beyond yourself and you will appreciate the list and those that fell short of the list. It is the top science stories not discoveries.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  7. 7. letxequalx 04:26 PM 12/23/10

    I just thought that this was as good a place as any to share my experience of how much more satisfying my web surfing has been this year since I got rid of Explorer, switched to Mozilla Foxfire, set i Google as my homepage and installed (among others) the Scientific American gadget/news app. I now get the news and information that I care about waiting conveniently for me on my PC without a lot of lies and nonsense and stuff I don't care about. I am happy to join the cool kids.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  8. 8. Trent1492 07:08 PM 12/23/10

    @Letxequal,

    "I got rid of Explorer, switched to Mozilla Foxfire, set i Google as my homepage and installed (among others) the Scientific American gadget/news app."

    I want to be the first to welcome you into the 21st Century :)

    "I now get the news and information that I care about waiting conveniently for me on my PC without a lot of lies and nonsense and stuff I don't care about. I am happy to join the cool kids."

    Kewl

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  9. 9. frankboase in reply to Eyquem 01:21 AM 12/24/10

    Yes the banks frack us all the time

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  10. 10. Fabrice LOTY 09:52 AM 12/24/10

    Good Day, all of you who celebrate science highlights this year.
    I need to point out that this exciting story about possible planets blessed with life has a strong potential to stir emotions. Thus, if there was anything of a progress on this line of research, emotions would run higher. As far as present science is studied the physical space is lifeless.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  11. 11. Fabrice LOTY 09:52 AM 12/24/10

    Good Day, all of you who celebrate science highlights this year.
    I need to point out that this exciting story about possible planets blessed with life has a strong potential to stir emotions. Thus, if there was anything of a progress on this line of research, emotions would run higher. As far as present science is studied the physical space is lifeless.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  12. 12. cespar 02:46 PM 12/24/10

    I am wondering about the antipathy toward Explorer. I am simply ignorant. I use Foxfire at school, typically for academic topics, and I don't notice a difference (but I've not been looking) between browsers. What should I know? I am also ignorant about the concept of open source, though I understand there is a lot of enthusiasm for it. Will someone enlighten?

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  13. 13. ennui 07:03 PM 12/24/10

    It should have included the rejection of the technology of the Flying Saucer (Gravity Control) as a means of Space travel after some incompetents in Cleveland, Ohio, used it by using the configuration of an E-Bomb and caused a black-out in large parts of the USA and Canada.
    A Heavy Lifter, costing one Billion Dollars, will not be any competition for a $50 million real Spacecraft.
    In Russia they have already decided that rockets are not the way to go to Deep Space. There are no tank stations.
    Is the new Nasa's Management just incompetent and does it still not know that?
    Or do some people have fingers in a pie?

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  14. 14. Zhubo 03:10 AM 12/25/10

    不错

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  15. 15. eco-steve 08:01 AM 12/27/10

    One of the major problems the world is facing is climate change. What can we do about it? See :
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/p00chrk9/one_planet_2050_an_earth_odyssey/
    Notice how finally Pyrolysis technology is now considered as the major remedy, where in the past it got no mention at all. Deciders, scientists and investors, please take note! Happy New Year...

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  16. 16. eco-steve 08:03 AM 12/27/10

    In the previous comment p00chrk9 is p zero zero c h r k 9

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  17. 17. quixote218 03:37 PM 12/27/10

    You have an error in the description of the Deepwater Horizon spill. You call it "one of the worst natural disasters" and while it is a disaster affecting the natural world it is most certainly a man-made disaster and not a natural one like an earthquake or tornado. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/natural+disaster

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  18. 18. E-boy in reply to Hollycow 10:49 PM 12/27/10

    Not all science that is done has immediate practical benefit. That's not the same as having no benefit. Scientific progress isn't as straight forward as a lot of folks would like to think, there is a lot of blind luck. To put it bluntly no one knows what bits of knowledge we get now will turn out to have utility later. Nuclear physics took quite some time to get put to practical use, and while some would point out that nuclear bombs are bad, what about nuclear medical imaging? Predictions like that work about as well as weather forecasting. In the near term one can intelligently speculate, but the further out you get...

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  19. 19. Hel-n-highwater 03:51 PM 12/28/10

    Do I detect luddites on the site? Early astronomers, including the old dude who had to retract his book on the earth going round the sun or suffer excommunication by the RACK are turning over in their graves. The use of the glass rounds by Leawenhook to observe animicules was useless at the time. Oh PLEASE, get off of my planet.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  20. 20. juxtapose82 in reply to tmusselman26 10:14 AM 12/29/10

    Fracking is harmful when done incorrectly. I have a friend who is in the safety field and has some very bad horror stories from past mistakes. One of the big problems to why fracking is seen as such a problem is due to the sins of the past. In my area (the Northeast) natural gas is the rage. Well federal law never had the companies cap the areas they fracked in nothing was found. They merely were allowed to move to the next site and allow the chemicals to leach back into the the water supply. Well of course sometimes it took years but the final result was always bad, but not devastating.

    I am not advocating fracking but the majority of horror stories are coming from a time with less restriction. I am by no means an expert but I know a lot of people who have natural gas wells on their property and nobody has any problems. In fact the one lady I am referring to has had the wells on her property for over 30 years and hasn't suffered anything from them. And she is on a well.

    I do agree that companies seem to have a problem doing the right thing if they save a buck by ignoring what they should do. And yes, the chemicals are bad for the environment if brought to the surface but if done properly they will not harm the rocks they are used to fracture.

    And now I await all the horrible posts by people who have read articles and have no first hand experience with anything I just said.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.
Advertisement

Email this Article

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X