Slide Shows | More Science

Dogged Research: The Top 10 Canines of Science [Slide Show]

Dogs have played heroic roles throughout the history of modern science in experiments that weren't always humane

  • Share
  • Email
  •  1 of 10  
Snuppy
thumb: Snuppy

Snuppy

Sure the cloning of Dolly the sheep in 1996 was a big deal. But let's be honest, a sheep has nothing on a puppy. So when scientists at Seoul National University introduced to the world history's first cloned dog in 2005, a floppy Afghan hound pup named Snuppy (after the university), we were quickly besotted....[More]

Pavlov's Dog
thumb: Pavlov's Dog

Pavlov's Dog

By today's standards, Ivan Pavlov's experiments on dogs would make him the canine equivalent of Dr. Kevorkian, but in 1904 the Russian physiologist was celebrated with a Nobel Prize for unmasking the inner workings of the digestive system (for example, he would implant tubes into dogs' stomachs to study gastric secretions), which previously had been a mystery to scientists....[More]

Shadow
thumb: Shadow

Shadow

Craig Venter had a dog—in fact, he had three. He also had a penchant for racing to sequence the genomes of organisms. Which is how on September 26, 2003, The Institute for Genome Research (now known as the J....[More]

Tasha
thumb: Tasha

Tasha

By the time Shadow's draft genome was in press at Science, scientists at the National Institutes of Health's National Human Genome Research Institute were holding auditions to find the best dog for the job of having its entire genome sequenced....[More]

Marjorie on the roof being fed
thumb: Marjorie on the roof being fed

Marjorie on the roof being fed

Before the discovery of insulin in 1921 diabetics suffered an inexorable demise. Enter Fred Banting, a broke Ontario doctor, and his student helper Charles Best....[More]

Polly
thumb: Polly

Polly

Charles Darwin, the grandfather of evolution and dog owner many times over, was a keen observer of his four-legged friends and how they related to his academic pursuits....[More]

Melanoma dog
thumb: Melanoma dog

Melanoma dog

If history didn't back it up, the first reported case of a dog sniffing out cancer might have been dismissed as a tasteless April Fools' joke.

Two London dermatologists wrote a short letter titled, "Sniffer Dogs in the Melanoma Clinic?" in the April 1, 1989, issue of The Lancet....[More]

Laika
thumb: Laika

Laika

Laika, which means barker in Russian, had the honor of being the very first dog in orbit—nay, the very first Earthling in orbit.* Who would have thought a stray from the streets of Moscow would get so far?...[More]

Labs on Ice
thumb: Labs on Ice

Labs on Ice

Without his canine helpers Arctic marine biologist Brendan Kelly's work would be lost, maybe even literally. That's because Kelly's research subjects, ringed seals, live under the sea ice during winter, surfacing to breathe in air pockets under the snowdrift....[More]

Goyet Dog
thumb: Goyet Dog

Goyet Dog

This unassuming dog skull was collected from the Goyet Cave in Belgium in the 1860s, but its significance didn't come to light until nearly 150 years later when radiocarbon dated it at 31,700 years old, making it the world's oldest dog....[More]

risk free title graphic

YES! Send me a free issue of Scientific American with no obligation to continue the subscription. If I like it, I will be billed for the one-year subscription.

cover image
ADVERTISEMENT

16 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. rearnold 02:18 PM 6/7/10

    Laika was the first dog in orbit not in space; there were two other USSR dogs on sub-orbital flights before Laika (and unlike Laika they survived return). Also there were a number of other insect and mice payloads to reach space (non-orbital) before Laika.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. Robin Lloyd 04:17 PM 6/7/10

    Thanks. We have updated the story to correct this.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. Semiahmoo 06:50 PM 6/7/10

    You're equating Dr Kevorkian with Dr. Mengele. Shame on you!

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  4. 4. Semiahmoo 06:51 PM 6/7/10

    You're equating Dr. Kevorkian with Dr. Mengele. Shame on you!

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  5. 5. Sensibility 12:11 AM 6/8/10

    Semiahmoo: Where did you get the name Dr. Mengele? Dr. Mengele is not mentioned in any of the 10 slides. Dr. Kevorkian was a reference made against Ivan Pavlov (slide #2).

    The reason Pavlov and Kevorkian are similar is both men are sadistic. Kevorkian did not consult with the doctors of the people he set up to commit suicide. Kevorkian only acted on the word of ill people. As a doctor Kevorkian should have known that medicated people do not always have the best sense of what is real and what is not. Could some of the ill people really have been in pain or did they just think they were in pain, possibly do to medication or psychological sympathy pain. Kevorkian could not know the answers to that question, unless he consulted with the numerous doctors that originally diagnosed the ill people Kevorkian set up to die. Kevorkian's failure to interact with the doctors that were originally linked to each of the Kevorkian suicides, BEFORE going through with the suicides, is what constitutes Kevorkian as a "serial killer" in the minds of many people. "First do no harm." and "Better safe, than sorry." are two quotes that should have been used by Kevorkian, before going through with the suicides. If the people were really terminally ill or in horrible pain, why did Kevorkian not get over-whelming evidence of such by several doctors before he set the suicides in motion? Answer: Kevorkian is a sadist and did not want to be stopped.

    Pavlov was the same way only towards animals. How did humans benefit by knowing that a dog salivates when trained by a bell and food to do so? Answer: Nothing was life-saving beneficial from any of Pavlov's animal experiments! Pavlov and Kevorkian both just wanted to inflict pain and death on living beings!! Pavlov and Kevorkian both were or are demented people who should never be given any honors!

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  6. 6. Linda Newbury 01:16 PM 6/8/10

    Pavlov was an idiot, creating attention for himself at the cost (painful) of the dogs. I'm betting God had a serious chat with him when he entered the 'Gates'. I once did research paper on "The Correlation Between Animal Abuse and Human Abuse." My finding was that a person who could abuse an animal was also likely to abuse a human (especially elder and child abuse). My heart goes out to the poor human beings surrounding Pavlov.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  7. 7. Linda Newbury 01:17 PM 6/8/10

    Pavlov was an idiot, creating attention for himself at the cost (painful) of the dogs. I'm betting God had a serious chat with him when he entered the 'Gates'. I once did research paper on "The Correlation Between Animal Abuse and Human Abuse." My finding was that a person who could abuse an animal was also likely to abuse a human (especially elder and child abuse). My heart goes out to the poor human beings surrounding Pavlov.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  8. 8. Ferdinand 10:47 PM 6/8/10

    Let's not forget that this isn't just in the past. A mind-boggling amount of the current research using animals (much of which is funded by government/tax sources) is redundant, useless, and indefensibly cruel. How many animals does it take for us to prove alcohol/tobacco/drugs are harmful to living beings? And the Animal Welfare Act doesn't even classify birds and rodents as animals....

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  9. 9. Charlie VW 06:18 PM 6/9/10

    Juvenile diabetes (aka type 1) was a fatal disease up until 1921 when Canadian physicians Banting and Best demonstrated that laboratory dogs with their pancreases (and therefore their insulin-producing beta cells) removed, could be kept alive via injections of insulin that had been extracted from the pancreases of cattle and pigs. I've lived nearly 50 years longer than I other would have, thanks to Banting, Best, and their dogs.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  10. 10. tip184 10:27 PM 6/9/10

    Pavlov's studies did much to elucidate mechanisms of learning that hold in all species that have been examined - nonhuman and human alike. His work with dogs paved the way for current research that sheds light on brain mechanisms responsible for human memory, both in the healthy brain and the brain afflicted with Alzheimer's disease. Pavlov was so successful precisely because he cared deeply about the health and well-being of his dogs. Visitors to the site of his laboratory will see the monument to his dogs that he built with his own funds. One of his lasting legacies, beyond the principles of learning that he discovered, was the importance of the psychological and physical health of the animals to the quality of his data.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  11. 11. shibby111 02:41 PM 6/10/10

    I love staffordshire terriers, they are beautiful, friendly, and just awesome looking! <a href="http://www.electroniccigarettesinc.com">electronic cigarette</a>

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  12. 12. Levy, Nadav 08:10 AM 6/13/10

    What about the border-collie, named Rico? I think this dog have been reported as the most clever dog ever, and in the behavioural point of views, I think Rico was the smartest dog.
    Nadav Levy, Israel

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  13. 13. Levy, Nadav 08:12 AM 6/13/10

    What about the Border-Collie, named Rico? In my opinion he have been recorded by sience magazine as the smartest dog in global point of view.
    Nadav Levy, Israel

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  14. 14. Rothtor 09:41 AM 6/18/10

    Can you please say "killed" instead of "chloroformed", please?

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  15. 15. BertieFox 08:08 AM 6/19/10

    Why are you attacking Pavlov while the "scientists" who sent Laika into space to die of heat exhaustion and stress are presumably 'animal lovers'?
    The experiment proved absolutely nothing and was just the sadistic sacrifice of an animal's life.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  16. 16. Dimitris 08:53 AM 6/22/10

    All those that object any kind of animal research, I wonder if they would hold the same opinion if they or one of their kin were diagnosed with a terminal, incurable disease. Would they be brave enough to choose death over the glimmer of hope offered by extensive tests of various pharmaceuticals on animals?

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.
Advertisement

Email this Article

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X