The Science of Online Dating

Looking to get ahead in the online dating world? Science has evidence for some surprising tips.

—Eliene Augenbraun, Christopher Intagliata

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

So you want to find a date. And you want science to help you. Well, you’re in luck.

This is Scientific American’s 60-Second Science. I’m Christopher Intagliata. Got a minute?

If you happen to be combing through the scientific literature for inspiration, you might just find it in the form of a, quote, “systematic review on converting online contact into a first date.” In other words, scientific ways to up your online dating game.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Some of these evidence-based tactics are obvious. Post an attractive profile pic. Be nice. Be funny. Others are less so. For example, pick a user name that starts with letters in the first half of the alphabet. A through M seem to up the odds.

And when filling in your profile, keep in mind the golden 70:30 ratio. 70 percent stuff about you, 30 percent what you’re lookin’ for. A profile all about you might come across as self-absorbed.

As for photos, previous studies suggest a genuine smile and a slight head tilt will boost your appeal. And group photos that showcase the fact that other people have fun around you are a good thing. Especially if you are in the center of the shot.

The researchers also write that women find men more attractive when they see other women smiling at him. Although my unscientific poll of a few female friends revealed that shots of other women smiling at you might be a no-no.

The review is in the journal, Evidence-Based Medicine.

Last piece of advice: Everyone thinks they’re special. So don’t just wink or write “nice profile.” Personalize your message. One of the more bizarre suggestions in that vein is to use rhyming in your note to a potential date.  If her username is “Fit and Attractive,” for example, the authors suggest writing that you’re quote “very adaptive”—although that might seem a bit overactive.

Thanks for the minute! For Scientific American’s 60-Second Science, I’m Christopher Intagliata.

 

See Also:

Mind & Brain: Is Lying Rational?

Health: High Heels, High Risk

Health: Food Everywhere Fuels Obesity

Energy & Sustainability: The U.S.’s Quietest Places

Evolution: An Octopus That Can “See” with Its Skin

Space: When Black Holes Collide

 

 

Credits:

Producer: Eliene Augenbraun

Writer and Narrator: Christopher Intagliata

Audio Editor: Steve Mirsky

 

Stock Footage:

VideoBlocks

Getty Images

Thinkstock Images

 

Special Thanks:

Fuse

Getty Images

Thinkstock Images

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe