Little Quake, Big Shakeup

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Image: University of Delaware

For more than two decades, scientists studying hydrothermal circulation in the water under the seafloor have assumed that the flow is relatively stable. But the far-reaching effects of a small earthquake that occurred last June off the Washington coast are shaking up their view. According to a report in today's issue of the journal Nature, that modest rumble caused 10-fold increases in the flow of fluids in hydrothermal vent systems located nearly five miles away. The temperature of the fluid in the vents, like the one pictured at right, increased as well, and strange temperature oscillations ensued.

"This was not just a local event," says lead author Paul Johnson of the University of Washington."We're continuing to try to determine how much of the ridge system may have changed in reponse to the earthquake. It could be that the fluids over hundreds of miles of midocean ridges are influenced by even moderate quakes."


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


As it turned out, the altered conditions proved favorable to organisms living on the chemicals in the vent fluids, resulting in greater biological activity. This, in turn, may have caused those mysterious temperature oscillations. An alternative explanation for the oscillations is that the earthquake may have driven cracks in the seafloor down into hotter crustal rocks, releasing heat into the system. The third hypothesis offered in the report is that the new earthquake-induced circulation caused a temporarily unstable temperature. In hopes that new data will help clarify what is going on, Johnson is heading up an expedition to set up additional instruments in the area.

Kate Wong is an award-winning science writer and senior editor for features at Scientific American, where she has focused on evolution, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, paleontology and animal behavior. She is fascinated by human origins, which she has covered for nearly 30 years. Recently she has become obsessed with birds. Her reporting has taken her to caves in France and Croatia that Neandertals once called home to the shores of Kenya’s Lake Turkana in search of the oldest stone tools in the world, as well as to Madagascar on an expedition to unearth ancient mammals and dinosaurs, the icy waters of Antarctica, where humpback whales feast on krill, and a “Big Day” race around the state of Connecticut to find as many bird species as possible in 24 hours. Wong is co-author, with Donald Johanson, of Lucy’s Legacy: The Quest for Human Origins. She holds a bachelor of science degree in biological anthropology and zoology from the University of Michigan. Follow her on Bluesky @katewong.bsky.social

More by Kate Wong

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe