IN our day but little time elapses between the discovery and its application. Our starting-point is as recent as the year 1903, when Paul Curie and Laborde showed experimentally that radium steadily maintains its temperature above its surroundings. As in the case of many other momentous discoveries, prediction and even calculation had preceded it. Rutherford and McClung, two years before the date of the experiment, had calculated the heat equivalent of the ionization effected by uranium, radium, and thorium. Even at this date (1903) there was much to go upon, and ideas as to the cosmic influence of radio-activity were not slow in spreading. But few have seen a thermometer rising under the influence of a few centigrammes of a radium salt; but for those who pay due respect to the principles of thermodynamics, the mere fact that at any moment the gold leaves of the electroscope may be set in motion by a trace of radium, or better still, the perpetual motion of Strutt's “radium clock,” is all that is required as demonstration of the ceaseless outflow of energy attending the events proceeding within the atomic systems. Although the term “ceaseless” is justified in comparison with our own span of existence, the radium clock will in point of fact run down, and the heat outflow gradually diminish. Next year there will be less energy forthcoming to drive the clock, and less heat given off by the radium by about the one three- thousandth part of what now is evolved. As geologists accustomed to deal with millions of years, we must conclude that these actions, so far from being ceaseless, are ephemeral indeed, and that if importance is to be ascribed to radium as a geological agent, we must seek to find if the radium now perishing off the earth is not made good by some more enduringly active substance. That uranium is the primary source of supply cannot be regarded as a matter of inference only. The recent discovery of ionium by Boltwood serves to link uranium and radium, and explains why it was that those who sought for radium as the immediate offspring of uranium found the latter apparently unproductive, the actual relation of uranium to radium being that of grandparent. But even were we without this connected knowledge, the fact of the invariable occurrence in nature of these elements, not only in association but in a quantitative relationship, can be explained only on a genetic connection between the two. This evidence, mainly due to the work of Bolt- wood, when examined in detail, becomes overwhelmingly convincing. Thus it is to uranium that we look for the continuance of the supplies of radium. In it we find an all but eternal source. The fraction of this substance which decays each year, or, rather, is transformed to a lower atomic weight, is measured in tens of thousands of millionths; so that the uranium of the earth one hundred million years ago was hardly more than 1 per cent greater in mass than it is to-day. As radio-active investigations became more refined and extended, it was discovered that radium was widely diffused over the earth. The emanation of it was obtained from the atmosphere, from the soil, from caves. It was extracted from well waters. Radium was found in brick-earths, and everywhere in rocks containing the least trace of demonstrable uranium, and Rutherford calculated that a quantity of radium so minute as 4.6 X 10-” grammes per gramme of the earth's mass would compensate for all the heat now passing out through its surface as determined by the average temperature gradients. In 1906 the Hon. R. J. Strutt, to whom geology owes so much, not only here but in other lines of advance, was able to announce, from a systematic examination of rocks and minerals from various parts of the world, that the average quantity of radium per gramme was many times in excess of what Rutherford estimated as adequate to account for terrestrial heat-loss. The only inference possible was that the surface radium was not an indication of what was distributed throughout the mass of the earth, and, as you all know, Strutt suggested a world deriving its internal temperature from a radium jacket some 45 miles in thickness, the interior being free from radium. My own experimental work, begun in 1904, was laid aside until after Mr. Strutt's paper had appeared, and a valued correspondence with its distinguished author was permitted to me. This address will be concerned with the application of my results to questions of geological dynamics. Did space permit I would, indeed, like to dwell for a little on the practical aspect of measurements as yet so little used or understood; for the difficulties to be overcome are considerable, and the precautions to be taken many. The quantities dealt with are astound- ingly minute, and to extract with completeness a total of a few billionths of a cubic millimeter of the radioactive gas—the emanation—from perhaps half a liter or more of a solution rich in dissolved substances cannot be regarded as an operation exempt from possibility of error and errors of deficiency are accordingly frequently met with. Special difficulties, too, arise when dealing with certain classes of rocks. For in some rocks the radium is not uniformly diffused, but is concentrated in radio-active substances. We are in these cases assailed with all the troubles which beset the assayer of gold who is at a loss to determine the average yield of a rock wherein the ore is sporadically distributed. In the case of radium determinations this difficulty may be so much more intensified as the isolated quantities involved are the more minute and yet the more potent to affect the result of any one experiment. There is here a source of discrepancy in successive experiments upon those rocks in which, from metamorphic or other actions, a segregation- of the uranium has taken place. With such rocks the divergences between successive results are often considerable, and only by multiplying the number of experiments can we hope to obtain fair indications of the average radio-activity. It is noteworthy that these variations do not, so far as my observations extend, present themselves when we deal with a recent marine sediment or with certain unaltered deposits wherein there has been no readjustment of the original fine state of subdivision, and even distribution, which attended the precipitation of the uranium in the process of sedimentation. But the difficulties attending the estimation of radium in rocks and other materials leave still a large balance of certainty—so far as the word is allowable when applied to the ever-widening views of science— upon which to base our deductions. The emanation of radium is most characteristic in behavior; knowledge of its peculiarities enables us to distinguish its presence in the electroscope not only from the emanation of other radio-active elements, but from any accidental leakage of inductive disturbance of the instrument. The method of measurement is purely comparative. The cardinal facts upon the strength of which we associate radium with geological dynamics, its development of heat and its association with uranium, are founded in the first case directly on observation, and, in the second, on evidence so strong as to be equally convincing. Recent work on the question of the influence of conditions of extreme pressures and temperatures on the radio-active properties of radium appear to show that, as would be anticipated, the effect is small, if indeed existent. As observed by Makower and Rutherford, the small diminution noticed under very extreme conditions in the 'Y radiation possibly admits of explanation on indirect effects. These observations appear to leave us a free hand as regards radio-thermal effects unless when we pursue speculations into the remoter depths of the earth, and even there while they remain as a reservation, they by no means forbid us to go on. The precise quantity of heat to which radium gives rise, or, rather, which its presence entails, cannot be said to be known to within a small percentage, for the thermal equivalent of the radio-active energy of uranium, actinium, and ionium, and of those members of the radium family which are slow in changing, has not been measured directly. Prof. Rutherford has supplied me, however, with the calculated amount of the aggregate heat energy liberated per second by all these bodies. In the applications to which I shall presently have to refer 1 take 'his estimate of 5.6 X 10-2 calories per second as the constant of heat-production attending the presence of one gramme of elemental radium. To these words of introduction 1 have to add the remark, perhaps obvious, that the full and ultimate analysis of the many geological questions arising out of the presence of radium in the earth's surface materials will require to be founded upon a broader basis than is afforded by even a few hundred experiments. The whole sequence of sediments has to be systematically examined; the various classes of igneous material, more especially the successive ejecta of volcanoes, fully investigated. The conditions of entry of uranium into the oceanic deposits have to be studied, and observations on sea-water and deep-sea sediments multiplied. All this work is for the future; as yet but little has been accomplished.
This article was originally published with the title "Uranium and Geology" in s , , 318 (March 2013)