
Readers Respond to the February 2019 Issue
Letters to the editor from the February 2019 issue of Scientific American
Letters to the editor from the February 2019 issue of Scientific American
Innovation and discovery as chronicled in Scientific American
Policies need to address a deeper, more systemic failure of global recycling systems
Tech experts can’t guarantee it’s safe
Top news from around the world
Missiles designed to destroy incoming nuclear warheads fail frequently in tests and could increase global risk of mass destruction
Black and Hispanic people in the U.S. are exposed to more emissions than whites and consume less from the industries responsible
Agency officials press sometimes confused stakeholders for more data. Is it possible to define a “more effective CBD cosmetic?”
The materials used in iPhones and Tesla cars need not become a long-term casualty of a U.S.-China trade war
Greenhouse gas contributions from air travel are expected to rapidly increase in the near future
That’s more than any administration since the Union of Concerned Scientists started tracking
It produces better patient outcomes. Here’s why it works and how it can be effectively deployed
Chinese firms violated international law by using a banned, potent greenhouse gas in insulation manufacturing
Understanding why living on the street seems to cause rapid aging could help homeless people—and governments
On June 6, a panel of experts convened by Scientific American and Nature Research—part of Springer Nature—will talk about the issue and possible solutions in Washington, D.C...
The atomic age would mark the start of the current geologic time unit, if proposal receives final approval
We should stop being so embarrassed by uncertainty and embrace it as a strength rather than a weakness of scientific reasoning
Converting methane into a less potent greenhouse gas would need to be done along with overall emissions reductions
Saying you care about the environment a bit is hollow if you’re not ready to change your diet
Support science journalism.
Thanks for reading Scientific American. Knowledge awaits.
Already a subscriber? Sign in.
Thanks for reading Scientific American. Create your free account or Sign in to continue.
Create Account