New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Better Than Sci-Fi

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Science fiction has imagined some pretty wild ideas about the universe and our place in it. Parallel or alternative universes have been a recurrent theme in Star Trek. In Interstellar, an astronaut explores hidden extra dimensions. The Matrix and other movies have depicted ordinary life on Earth as nothing but a holographic or mental projection. But these imaginings all seem downright tame compared with the mind-bending science now coming out of physics and astronomy.

The weirdness begins at the moment of creation. We have long thought of the big bang as the beginning of time, but theorists now have an idea of what might have come before. Could our 3-D universe have sprung from the formation of a black hole in a 4-D cosmos? The math says: maybe.

Then again, black holes might be quite different from the conventional picture of a point-like singularity surrounded by an invisible event horizon—the boundary beyond which escape is impossible. As physicist Joseph Polchinski explains, the laws of quantum physics suggest instead that black holes may literally be large, spherical holes devoid of space and time. If so, then event horizons might actually be solid shells. And they should be quite visible, seething with an intense, instantly lethal fire of high-energy particles.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Increasingly, it seems as though hardly anything out there is what it first appears to be. The first stars to form may have been so huge they arguably deserve a new label. Our own Milky Way galaxy has a gigantic dumbbell of glowing gas skewering its center that no one noticed until recently. Even our most fundamental notions of what reality is are now up for debate—although there may be less dramatic ways to interpret the bizarre behaviors seen in the quantum realm.

Much of this new science is made possible by technological innovations. They include 5,000-odd sensors frozen deep within a cubic kilometer of crystal-clear ice in Antarctica—an array that might shine light on the puzzling nature of dark matter. Scientists are also dissecting molecules with the most powerful x-ray laser in the world and using a 570-megapixel camera to scan the heavens for clues to the mystery of dark energy. And don't forget the most useful tool of all for physics: mathematics.

Advanced physics can seem abstract, but it does connect to everyday life. Living things, too, must abide by the rules of quantum mechanics. And physics may eventually set an upper limit to human intelligence. In the meantime, it makes us smarter.

W. Wayt Gibbs is a contributing editor for Scientific American based in Seattle. He also works as a scientific editor at Intellectual Ventures.

More by W. Wayt Gibbs
SA Special Editions Vol 24 Issue 4sThis article was published with the title “Better Than Sci-Fi” in SA Special Editions Vol. 24 No. 4s (), p. 1
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanphysics1215-1

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe