Does Physics Have a Problem?

Editor in chief Mariette DiChristina introduces the May 2014 issue of Scientific American

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

It was 2012, and physicists had just announced the big news: CERN's Large Hadron Collider had delivered what looked like (and was later confirmed to be) a Higgs particle, the capstone of a decades-long search to complete the so-called Standard Model of particle physics—a discovery that would lead the following year to a Nobel Prize. Naturally, many scientists immediately eyed the next piece of the puzzle that they anticipate the LHC will uncover. “I'm still hanging tough, hoping for supersymmetry,” said John Ellis of King's College London at the time, referring to the theory of matter that many physicists thought would supplant the Standard Model.

Since then, however, the search for “superpartner” particles that would help describe why particles have the masses they do and would solve the mystery of dark matter has led to disappointments. So far, as Joseph Lykken and Maria Spiropulu relate in their cover story, “Supersymmetry and the Crisis in Physics,” the “results from the first run of the LHC have ruled out almost all the best-studied versions” of the theory. A higher-power run is due in 2015, but there is no guarantee it will yield the answers. Then what?

While we wait for the foundational picture of how the universe works to take better shape, we can watch machines develop the ability to take different forms here on Earth. In “Shape-Shifting Things to Come” Sridhar Kota chronicles efforts to employ elastic, or compliant, design in our man-made contraptions. Instead of using many rigid parts in complex and often inefficient systems, as is done today, such designs can distribute loads across flexible devices made of fewer parts. The materials could enable such applications as bendable aircraft wings and snake robots, and their use would improve efficiency and durability in our engineered creations. They may not solve some of our profound questions about the universe, but they could make things easier here in the meantime.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Citizen Science: Last Chance to Enter

Entries close on May 12 for the Google Science Fair, which includes a chance to win the $50,000 Scientific American Science in Action Award. The international competition is open to students ages 13 to 18. Science in Action honors a project that can make a practical difference by tackling an environmental, health or resources challenge; the prize includes a year of mentoring to continue to advance the winning work. Details can be found at ScientificAmerican.com/education/science-in-actionM.D.

Mariette DiChristina, Steering Group chair, is dean and professor of the practice in journalism at the Boston University College of Communication. She was formerly editor in chief of Scientific American and executive vice president, Magazines, for Springer Nature.

More by Mariette DiChristina
Scientific American Magazine Vol 310 Issue 5This article was published with the title “Does Physics Have a Problem?” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 310 No. 5 (), p. 6
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0514-6

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe