How Human Creativity Arose

Editor in Chief Mariette DiChristina introduces the March 2013 issue of Scientific American

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

After passing through a dark shaft in September 1940, four teenage boys entered an underground chamber filled with wondrous drawings—hundreds of figures of animals, such as horses and deer, and other markings. What must they have thought on first seeing such an array of fantastic imagery from our forbears?

Lascaux Cave, located near Montignac, France, contains more than 2,000 paintings and engravings, which date to some 15,000 or more years ago. The site offers a spectacular example of human creativity, to be sure, but it is far from the first. Still, such a high level of artistry and ingenuity were a long time in coming for our species—as scientists are only now beginning to fully appreciate.

You will learn in our cover story, “The Origins of Creativity,” by Heather Pringle, that “although our human lineage emerged in Africa around six million years ago, early family members left behind little visible record of innovation for nearly 3.4 million years”—probably at least partly because tools or any such items were from wood or other plant material. Stone tools eventually materialize in the archaeological record but hardly change in design for more than a million years.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Most researchers have pointed to the Upper Paleolithic, around 40,000 years ago, when Homo sapiens started adorning cave walls with images of Ice Age animals and forging inventive beaded designs and other innovations, as when the early spark of creativity finally caught fire—yielding the kind of rapid-fire innovative thought that characterizes our species today. But rather than emerging suddenly, relatively recently in our evolutionary history, our creative powers appear to have developed over hundreds of thousands of years, as various biological and other factors came together. In her article, which begins on page 36, Pringle describes the fascinating detective story behind unraveling these lines of evidence.

It's a good thing we evolved ingenuity because we'll need it to combat some of the pressing challenges that we cover elsewhere in the issue. Consider the unpleasant prospect of “The End of Orange Juice,” which senior editor Anna Kuchment describes in her feature, starting on page 52; citrus trees are under a global attack by a bacterial infection. In “New Threat from Poxviruses,” beginning on page 66, Sonia Shah writes about the worrisome cousins of smallpox, monkeypox and cowpox. These are certainly serious matters, but our best hope remains with humanity's most innovation-enhancing invention: science.

Mariette DiChristina, Steering Group chair, is dean and professor of the practice in journalism at the Boston University College of Communication. She was formerly editor in chief of Scientific American and executive vice president, Magazines, for Springer Nature.

More by Mariette DiChristina
Scientific American Magazine Vol 308 Issue 3This article was published with the title “The Story of Creation” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 308 No. 3 (), p. 4
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0313-4

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe