New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

How Human Creativity Arose

Editor in Chief Mariette DiChristina introduces the March 2013 issue of Scientific American

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

After passing through a dark shaft in September 1940, four teenage boys entered an underground chamber filled with wondrous drawings—hundreds of figures of animals, such as horses and deer, and other markings. What must they have thought on first seeing such an array of fantastic imagery from our forbears?

Lascaux Cave, located near Montignac, France, contains more than 2,000 paintings and engravings, which date to some 15,000 or more years ago. The site offers a spectacular example of human creativity, to be sure, but it is far from the first. Still, such a high level of artistry and ingenuity were a long time in coming for our species—as scientists are only now beginning to fully appreciate.

You will learn in our cover story, “The Origins of Creativity,” by Heather Pringle, that “although our human lineage emerged in Africa around six million years ago, early family members left behind little visible record of innovation for nearly 3.4 million years”—probably at least partly because tools or any such items were from wood or other plant material. Stone tools eventually materialize in the archaeological record but hardly change in design for more than a million years.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Most researchers have pointed to the Upper Paleolithic, around 40,000 years ago, when Homo sapiens started adorning cave walls with images of Ice Age animals and forging inventive beaded designs and other innovations, as when the early spark of creativity finally caught fire—yielding the kind of rapid-fire innovative thought that characterizes our species today. But rather than emerging suddenly, relatively recently in our evolutionary history, our creative powers appear to have developed over hundreds of thousands of years, as various biological and other factors came together. In her article, which begins on page 36, Pringle describes the fascinating detective story behind unraveling these lines of evidence.

It's a good thing we evolved ingenuity because we'll need it to combat some of the pressing challenges that we cover elsewhere in the issue. Consider the unpleasant prospect of “The End of Orange Juice,” which senior editor Anna Kuchment describes in her feature, starting on page 52; citrus trees are under a global attack by a bacterial infection. In “New Threat from Poxviruses,” beginning on page 66, Sonia Shah writes about the worrisome cousins of smallpox, monkeypox and cowpox. These are certainly serious matters, but our best hope remains with humanity's most innovation-enhancing invention: science.

Mariette DiChristina, Steering Group chair, is dean and professor of the practice in journalism at the Boston University College of Communication. She was formerly editor in chief of Scientific American and executive vice president, Magazines, for Springer Nature.

More by Mariette DiChristina
Scientific American Magazine Vol 308 Issue 3This article was published with the title “The Story of Creation” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 308 No. 3 (), p. 4
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0313-4

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe