The Most Intriguing Environmental Stories of 2015

A terrible earthquake, massive drought and nuclear power captured the imagination this year

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

From the Paris Agreement to the accelerating clean energy revolution, 2015 was a big year for stories on energy and the environment, including its status as perhaps the last year in human history to see atmospheric concentrations of CO2 below 400 parts per million. Here are the leading stories published by Scientific Americanthis year:

(5) How the Deadly Nepal Earthquake Happened [Infographic]

This terrible earthquake was the most recent outcome in an ongoing collision of giant pieces of our planet, a slow-moving disaster that started about 50 million years ago

On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

(4) 11 Natural Wonders to See Before They Are Gone [Slide Show]

Global warming may transform these sites beyond recognition

(3) Mass Deaths in the Americas Start New CO2 Epoch

A new proposal pegs the start of the Anthropocene to the little ice age and the Columbian Exchange

(2) The World Really Could Go Nuclear

Nothing but fear and capital stand in the way of a nuclear-powered future

(1) U.S. Drought Will Be the Worst in 1,000 Years

The Southwest and central Great Plains will dry out even more than previously thought

Looking forward, 2016 promises to be another big year for the environment as stratigraphers decide whether to formally debate this idea of a new geologic epoch set off by humanity’s impact on the planet as well as an election in the U.S. that may determine whether or not this country continues to combat climate change.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American