New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Social Spider Groups Need Bold and Shy Members

Social spiders in artificially assembled groups of all bold or all shy members fared less well against predators than a group with some shy and some bold members.   

 

PhotoDisc/Getty Images (MARS)

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

What has eight legs, eight eyes, and lives together with thousands of others like it? Arachnophobia sufferers do not want to hear the answer—which is, spiders that live in large social groups.

It's pretty rare to find such group-living spiders. Of the 45,000 spider species we know about, only about 25 are social. These species weave massive webs and dwell in colonies of dozens, hundreds or even thousands of individual spiders.

"When we want to count the spiders inside the colony, what we do is, somebody rips apart the colony, basically, with their hands. We call it 'making it rain,' and then dozens or hundreds of spiders basically shower down on little silken lines like little parachuters." University of California Santa Barbara arachnologist Jonathan Pruitt.

He and his students study social spiders in South Africa's Kalahari Desert.After counting and weighing hundreds of African social spiders, Pruitt and his team gave each spider a personality assessment—some are bold, others shy. They wanted to understand how the personality composition of a colony influences its interactions with predators, and how the colony behaved over time.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


So the researchers combined their spiders into artificial groupings. Some of the experimental colonies were composed only of bold spiders, others of shy ones, and some had the two personality types in equal proportion. Then the researchers introduced predators to the party.

"The most voracious predator that they deal with is this pugnacious ant, Anoplolepis steingroveri, which is this horrible ant. If you dropped one of these social spiders onto the ground, it's identified in seconds. And so these ants rip it apart and then drag it over to their colony."

Turned out that the mixed-personality colonies were best able to learn from the repeated threat of ant raids, and build defensive nests to ward off attackers. Both the all-bold and all-shy colonies were less able to get it together enough to create their defensive structures, presumably because of too many—or not enough—leaders. The results are in the journal Animal Behaviour. [Colin M. Wright, Carl N. Keiser, & Jonathan N. Pruitt. Colony personality composition alters colony-level plasticity and magnitude of defensive behaviour in a social spider.]

"The cool thing about social spiders is we know that they have these personality differences, and we know that societies are organized along these individual differences in behavior—actually very similar to the way that human societies are organized in a lot of ways."

—Jason G. Goldman

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

Jason G. Goldman is a science journalist based in Los Angeles. He has written about animal behavior, wildlife biology, conservation, and ecology for Scientific American, Los Angeles magazine, the Washington Post, the Guardian, the BBC, Conservation magazine, and elsewhere. He contributes to Scientific American's "60-Second Science" podcast, and is co-editor of Science Blogging: The Essential Guide (Yale University Press). He enjoys sharing his wildlife knowledge on television and on the radio, and often speaks to the public about wildlife and science communication.

More by Jason G. Goldman

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe