Social Spider Groups Need Bold and Shy Members

Social spiders in artificially assembled groups of all bold or all shy members fared less well against predators than a group with some shy and some bold members.   

 

PhotoDisc/Getty Images (MARS)

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

What has eight legs, eight eyes, and lives together with thousands of others like it? Arachnophobia sufferers do not want to hear the answer—which is, spiders that live in large social groups.

It's pretty rare to find such group-living spiders. Of the 45,000 spider species we know about, only about 25 are social. These species weave massive webs and dwell in colonies of dozens, hundreds or even thousands of individual spiders.

"When we want to count the spiders inside the colony, what we do is, somebody rips apart the colony, basically, with their hands. We call it 'making it rain,' and then dozens or hundreds of spiders basically shower down on little silken lines like little parachuters." University of California Santa Barbara arachnologist Jonathan Pruitt.

He and his students study social spiders in South Africa's Kalahari Desert.After counting and weighing hundreds of African social spiders, Pruitt and his team gave each spider a personality assessment—some are bold, others shy. They wanted to understand how the personality composition of a colony influences its interactions with predators, and how the colony behaved over time.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


So the researchers combined their spiders into artificial groupings. Some of the experimental colonies were composed only of bold spiders, others of shy ones, and some had the two personality types in equal proportion. Then the researchers introduced predators to the party.

"The most voracious predator that they deal with is this pugnacious ant, Anoplolepis steingroveri, which is this horrible ant. If you dropped one of these social spiders onto the ground, it's identified in seconds. And so these ants rip it apart and then drag it over to their colony."

Turned out that the mixed-personality colonies were best able to learn from the repeated threat of ant raids, and build defensive nests to ward off attackers. Both the all-bold and all-shy colonies were less able to get it together enough to create their defensive structures, presumably because of too many—or not enough—leaders. The results are in the journal Animal Behaviour. [Colin M. Wright, Carl N. Keiser, & Jonathan N. Pruitt. Colony personality composition alters colony-level plasticity and magnitude of defensive behaviour in a social spider.]

"The cool thing about social spiders is we know that they have these personality differences, and we know that societies are organized along these individual differences in behavior—actually very similar to the way that human societies are organized in a lot of ways."

—Jason G. Goldman

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

Jason G. Goldman is a science journalist based in Los Angeles. He has written about animal behavior, wildlife biology, conservation, and ecology for Scientific American, Los Angeles magazine, the Washington Post, the Guardian, the BBC, Conservation magazine, and elsewhere. He contributes to Scientific American's "60-Second Science" podcast, and is co-editor of Science Blogging: The Essential Guide (Yale University Press). He enjoys sharing his wildlife knowledge on television and on the radio, and often speaks to the public about wildlife and science communication.

More by Jason G. Goldman

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe