30 under 30: Investigating Molecular Messengers and Human Health

Meet Aashish Manglik, one of the promising young chemists attending the 2013 Lindau Nobel Laureate Meeting

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Each year hundreds of the best and brightest researchers gather in Lindau, Germany, for the Nobel Laureate Meeting. There, the newest generation of scientists mingles with Nobel Prize winners and discusses their work and ideas. The 2013 meeting is dedicated to chemistry and will involve young researchers from 78 different countries. In anticipation of the event, which will take place from June 30 through July 5, we are highlighting a group of attendees under 30 who represent the future of chemistry. The following profile is the 19th in a series of 30.

Name: Aashish Manglik
Age: 25
Born: Lucknow, India
Nationality: U.S.

Current position: MD/PhD student in biophysics at Stanford University
Education: BA with a focus in chemistry and biology from Washington University in Saint Louis


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


What is your field of research?
My graduate research focuses on the function of G protein-coupled receptors, which are critical regulators of human physiology and pathophysiology. I use biochemical and biophysical approaches to examine how these important membrane proteins function at the atomic level.

What drew you to chemistry, and to that research area in particular?
I am drawn to chemistry, and biochemistry in particular, in order to understand the remarkable complexity of biological processes in a reductionist manner. I was particularly attracted to the GPCR field because better biochemical understanding of these proteins has direct consequences for human health and disease.

Where do you see yourself in 10 years?
Given my dual degree path, in 10 years I see myself using biochemical approaches to better understand human physiology or tackle recalcitrant diseases. G protein-coupled receptors—which are the focus of my graduate work—represent a particularly exciting field that aligns these interests. However, I remain excited to engage in new domains of biomedical science in my future research.

Who are your scientific heroes?
Richard Feynman for his ability to get people excited about science and my graduate advisor Brian Kobilka for his integrity and ingenuity.

What do you hope to gain from this year’s Lindau meeting?
The 2013 Lindau meeting will give me the ability to interact with exceptional role models in the fields of protein biochemistry and biophysics. I would like to learn how they honed in on the particular scientific questions that led to their most important discoveries and how they navigated obstacles. I’m also interested in the cutting edge science the laureates are currently engaged in. Finally, I am looking forward to meeting and discussing science with the next generation of scientific leaders attending the Lindau meeting.

Are there any Nobelists whom you are particularly excited to meet?
I am looking forward to meeting laureates that have used biophysical methods to understand important biochemical processes: Professor Erwin Neher, Professor Ada Yonath, Professor Kurt Wüthrich, and John E. Walker.

« Previous 18. Maria Vittoria Dozzi

30 Under 30: Lindau Nobel Laureate Meeting

Next » 20. Rebecca Melen

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe