New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

30 under 30: Probing Structures at the Nanoscale

Meet Evelyn Auyeung, one of the promising young chemists attending the 2013 Lindau Nobel Laureate Meeting

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Each year hundreds of the best and brightest researchers gather in Lindau, Germany, for the Nobel Laureate Meeting. There, the newest generation of scientists mingles with Nobel Prize winners and discusses their work and ideas. The 2013 meeting is dedicated to chemistry and will involve young researchers from 78 different countries. In anticipation of the event, which will take place from June 30 through July 5, we are highlighting a group of attendees under 30 who represent the future of chemistry. The following profile is the 10th in a series of 30.

Name: Evelyn Auyeung
Age: 25
Born: Hong Kong, China
Nationality: U.S.

Current position: PhD student at Northwestern University in Evanston, Ill., U.S.
Education: BA in chemistry from Amherst College in Amherst, Mass., U.S.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


What is your field of research?
I study the DNA-directed assembly of nanoparticles into ordered lattices, where in this system the nanoparticles act as the nanoscale equivalent of atoms held together by DNA “bonds.” The properties of many materials (diamonds, silicon, etcetera) derive from the crystalline arrangement of their atomic constituents, and my work has been to synthesize the nanoscale equivalent of atomic solids, characterize them and probe their collective properties.

What drew you to chemistry, and to that research area in particular?
Before college, I never thought about science as a career, only as a subject that I found interesting in high school. It was not until my college advisor gave me the opportunity to work in her lab doing inorganic synthesis that I began to understand what scientific research meant, and it was then that I seriously began considering graduate school and research as a plausible career option. My research as an undergraduate introduced me to techniques for synthesizing and probing materials on the atomic and nanoscales (x-rays, electron microscopy), topics that continue to interest me as a graduate student.

Where do you see yourself in 10 years?
In 10 years I see myself continuing a career in materials and chemistry research, although it’s hard to predict which specific scientific questions I will be trying to answer, since both the fields and my interests are continuously evolving.

Who are your scientific heroes?
Charles Darwin, Linus Pauling and Isaac Newton are my heroes because their work made science interesting for me in high school and college. Also, I admire Richard Feynman because his contributions toward the development of modern nanoscience have paved the way for my graduate school research.

What do you hope to gain from this year’s Lindau meeting?
When I first heard about Lindau as a first-year graduate student, I thought it was a brilliant idea for a conference and spent a few hours listening to talks from past meetings on the online archives. At the time, I could not have imagined attending Lindau in person, and to have it become a reality is a great honor for me. Personally, the Lindau meeting represents an once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to gain inspiration from the world’s best chemists as to how I can grow as a scientist and achieve my goals of eventually becoming a successful independent researcher. I look forward to hearing about each Nobel laureate’s unique process of discovery and chatting with them and other young researchers about what they believe are the important, unanswered research questions in science today.

 

« Previous 9. Fabian Erdel

30 Under 30: Lindau Nobel Laureate Meeting

Next » 11. Aniket Magarkar

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe