New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

2880 Asteroid Impact Simulation Suggests Tsunamis Could Hammer Atlantic Coast

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


On March 16, 2880, a 1.1-kilometer diameter asteroid known as 1950 DA is scheduled to swing so close to Earth that it could crash into the ocean. The probability of impact is small, but should it occur, scientists say, it could generate tsunami waves hundreds of feet high that would drench coastal areas.

Scientists announced last spring that 1950 DA had about a 0.3 percent chance of slamming into Earth. In the new work, which appears in the June issue of the Geophysical Journal International, Steven Ward and Erik Asphaug of the University of California, Santa Cruz, created a computer simulation of what might happen if the space rock touched down 600 kilometers east of the U.S. coastline (with oceans covering 70 percent of the earth's surface, a water landing is probable). Hurtling earthward at 17.8 kilometers a second, 1950 DA would blast a cavity 19 kilometers across in the sea and set into motion a series of tsunamis hundreds of meters high, they determined. Within two hours, 100-meter-high killer waves would break on the East Coast; within 12 hours 20-meter waves would reach Europe and Africa.

The researchers acknowledge that the likelihood of 1950 DA colliding with our planet in some 880 years is "vanishingly rare." Still, Ward observes, "from a geologic perspective, events like this have happened many times in the past. Asteroids the size of 1950 DA have probably struck the Earth about 600 times since the age of the dinosaurs." Rarity, the authors conclude, "requires perspective."

Kate Wong is an award-winning science writer and was formerly senior editor for features at Scientific American, where she focused on evolution, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, paleontology and animal behavior. She is fascinated by human origins, which she has covered for nearly 30 years. Recently she has become obsessed with birds. Her reporting has taken her to caves in France and Croatia that Neandertals once called home to the shores of Kenya’s Lake Turkana in search of the oldest stone tools in the world, as well as to Madagascar on an expedition to unearth ancient mammals and dinosaurs, the icy waters of Antarctica, where humpback whales feast on krill, and a “Big Day” race around the state of Connecticut to find as many bird species as possible in 24 hours. Wong is co-author, with Donald Johanson, of Lucy’s Legacy: The Quest for Human Origins. She holds a bachelor of science degree in biological anthropology and zoology from the University of Michigan. Follow her on Bluesky @katewong.bsky.social

More by Kate Wong

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe